<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="reeder-white-2003-granularity">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Granularity in MT evaluation</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Florence</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Reeder</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">John</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">White</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2003-sep 23-27</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Workshop on Systemizing MT Evaluation</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">New Orleans, USA</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>This paper looks at granularity issues in machine translation evaluation. We start with work by (White, 2001) who examined the correlation between intelligibility and fidelity at the document level. His work showed that intelligibility and fidelity do not correlate well at the document level. These dissimilarities lead to our investigation of evaluation granularity. In particular, we revisit the intelligibility and fidelity relationship at the corpus level. We expect these to support certain assumptions in both evaluations as well as indicate issues germane to future evaluations.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">reeder-white-2003-granularity</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2003.mtsummit-eval.5</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2003-sep 23-27</date>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Granularity in MT evaluation
%A Reeder, Florence
%A White, John
%S Workshop on Systemizing MT Evaluation
%D 2003
%8 sep 23 27
%C New Orleans, USA
%F reeder-white-2003-granularity
%X This paper looks at granularity issues in machine translation evaluation. We start with work by (White, 2001) who examined the correlation between intelligibility and fidelity at the document level. His work showed that intelligibility and fidelity do not correlate well at the document level. These dissimilarities lead to our investigation of evaluation granularity. In particular, we revisit the intelligibility and fidelity relationship at the corpus level. We expect these to support certain assumptions in both evaluations as well as indicate issues germane to future evaluations.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2003.mtsummit-eval.5

Markdown (Informal)

[Granularity in MT evaluation](https://aclanthology.org/2003.mtsummit-eval.5) (Reeder & White, MTSummit 2003)

• Granularity in MT evaluation (Reeder & White, MTSummit 2003)

ACL

• Florence Reeder and John White. 2003. Granularity in MT evaluation. In Workshop on Systemizing MT Evaluation, New Orleans, USA.