<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="reeder-2004-investigation">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Investigation of intelligibility judgments</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Florence</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Reeder</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2004-sep 28 - oct 2</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Robert</namePart>
            <namePart type="given">E</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Frederking</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Kathryn</namePart>
            <namePart type="given">B</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Taylor</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Springer</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Washington, USA</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>This paper describes an intelligibility snap-judgment test. In this exercise, participants are shown a series of human translations and machine translations and are asked to determine whether the author was human or machine. The experiment shows that snap judgments on intelligibility are made successfully and that system rankings on snap judgments are consistent with more detailed intelligibility measures. In addition to demonstrating a quick intelligibility judgment, representing on a few minutes time of each participant, it details the types of errors which led to the snap judgments.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">reeder-2004-investigation</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-30194-3_25</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2004-sep 28 - oct 2</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>227</start>
            <end>235</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Investigation of intelligibility judgments
%A Reeder, Florence
%Y Frederking, Robert E.
%Y Taylor, Kathryn B.
%S Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers
%D 2004
%8 sep 28  oct 2
%I Springer
%C Washington, USA
%F reeder-2004-investigation
%X This paper describes an intelligibility snap-judgment test. In this exercise, participants are shown a series of human translations and machine translations and are asked to determine whether the author was human or machine. The experiment shows that snap judgments on intelligibility are made successfully and that system rankings on snap judgments are consistent with more detailed intelligibility measures. In addition to demonstrating a quick intelligibility judgment, representing on a few minutes time of each participant, it details the types of errors which led to the snap judgments.
%U https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-30194-3_25
%P 227-235

Markdown (Informal)

[Investigation of intelligibility judgments](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-30194-3_25) (Reeder, AMTA 2004)

• Investigation of intelligibility judgments (Reeder, AMTA 2004)

ACL

• Florence Reeder. 2004. Investigation of intelligibility judgments. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas: Technical Papers, pages 227–235, Washington, USA. Springer.