@article{howes-etal-2011-incrementality,
title = "On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions",
author = "Howes, Christine and
Purver, Matthew and
Healey, Patrick G. T. and
Mills, Gregory J. and
Gregoromichelaki, Eleni",
editor = "Schlangen, David and
Rieser, Hannes and
Crocker, Matthew W.",
journal = "Dialogue {\&} Discourse",
volume = "2",
month = may,
year = "2011",
address = "Bielefeld, Germany",
publisher = "University of Bielefeld",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.3/",
doi = "10.5087/dad.2011.111",
pages = "279--311",
abstract = "Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions (CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.We present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dialogue phenomenon: almost 20{\%} of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with nearly 3{\%} being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic `constituents'; however, some systematic differences between same- and cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially introducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people{'}s expectations about who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or `party'.Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constituents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organization of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="howes-etal-2011-incrementality">
<titleInfo>
<title>On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christine</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Howes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Matthew</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Purver</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Patrick</namePart>
<namePart type="given">G</namePart>
<namePart type="given">T</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Healey</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Gregory</namePart>
<namePart type="given">J</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mills</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Eleni</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gregoromichelaki</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2011-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Dialogue & Discourse</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>University of Bielefeld</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Bielefeld, Germany</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions (CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.We present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dialogue phenomenon: almost 20% of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with nearly 3% being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic ‘constituents’; however, some systematic differences between same- and cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially introducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people’s expectations about who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or ‘party’.Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constituents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organization of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">howes-etal-2011-incrementality</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.5087/dad.2011.111</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.3/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2011-05</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>2</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>279</start>
<end>311</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions
%A Howes, Christine
%A Purver, Matthew
%A Healey, Patrick G. T.
%A Mills, Gregory J.
%A Gregoromichelaki, Eleni
%J Dialogue & Discourse
%D 2011
%8 May
%V 2
%I University of Bielefeld
%C Bielefeld, Germany
%F howes-etal-2011-incrementality
%X Spoken contributions in dialogue often continue or complete earlier contributions by either the same or a different speaker. These compound contributions (CCs) thus provide a natural context for investigations of incremental processing in dialogue.We present a corpus study which confirms that CCs are a key dialogue phenomenon: almost 20% of contributions fit our general definition of CCs, with nearly 3% being the cross-person case most often studied. The results suggest that processing is word-by-word incremental, as splits can occur within syntactic ‘constituents’; however, some systematic differences between same- and cross-person cases indicate important dialogue-specific pragmatic effects. An experimental study then investigates these effects by artificially introducing CCs into multi-party text dialogue. Results suggest that CCs affect people’s expectations about who will speak next and whether other participants have formed a coalition or ‘party’.Together, these studies suggest that CCs require an incremental processing mechanism that can provide a resource for constructing linguistic constituents that span multiple contributions and multiple participants. They also suggest the need to model higher-level dialogue units that have consequences for the organization of turn-taking and for the development of a shared context.
%R 10.5087/dad.2011.111
%U https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.3/
%U https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2011.111
%P 279-311
Markdown (Informal)
[On Incrementality in Dialogue: Evidence from Compound Contributions](https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.3/) (Howes et al., DND 2011)
ACL