<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="gregoromichelaki-etal-2011-incrementality">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Eleni</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Gregoromichelaki</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Ruth</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Kempson</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Matthew</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Purver</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Gregory</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">J</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Mills</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Ronnie</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Cann</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Wilfried</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Meyer-Viol</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Patrick</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">G</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">T</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Healey</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2011-05</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Dialogue &amp; Discourse</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <issuance>continuing</issuance>
            <publisher>University of Bielefeld</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Bielefeld, Germany</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
        <genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Ever since dialogue modelling first developed relative to broadly Gricean assumptions about utter-ance interpretation (Clark, 1996), it has remained an open question whether the full complexity of higher-order intention computation is made use of in everyday conversation. In this paper we examine the phenomenon of split utterances, from the perspective of Dynamic Syntax, to further probe the necessity of full intention recognition/formation in communication: we do so by exploring the extent to which the interactive coordination of dialogue exchange can be seen as emergent from low-level mechanisms of language processing, without needing representation by interlocutors of each other’s mental states, or fully developed intentions as regards messages to be conveyed. We thus illustrate how many dialogue phenomena can be seen as direct consequences of the grammar architecture, as long as this is presented within an incremental, goal-directed/predictive model.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">gregoromichelaki-etal-2011-incrementality</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.5087/dad.2011.109</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.7/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2011-05</date>
        <detail type="volume"><number>2</number></detail>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>199</start>
            <end>233</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Journal Article
%T Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing
%A Gregoromichelaki, Eleni
%A Kempson, Ruth
%A Purver, Matthew
%A Mills, Gregory J.
%A Cann, Ronnie
%A Meyer-Viol, Wilfried
%A Healey, Patrick G. T.
%J Dialogue & Discourse
%D 2011
%8 May
%V 2
%I University of Bielefeld
%C Bielefeld, Germany
%F gregoromichelaki-etal-2011-incrementality
%X Ever since dialogue modelling first developed relative to broadly Gricean assumptions about utter-ance interpretation (Clark, 1996), it has remained an open question whether the full complexity of higher-order intention computation is made use of in everyday conversation. In this paper we examine the phenomenon of split utterances, from the perspective of Dynamic Syntax, to further probe the necessity of full intention recognition/formation in communication: we do so by exploring the extent to which the interactive coordination of dialogue exchange can be seen as emergent from low-level mechanisms of language processing, without needing representation by interlocutors of each other’s mental states, or fully developed intentions as regards messages to be conveyed. We thus illustrate how many dialogue phenomena can be seen as direct consequences of the grammar architecture, as long as this is presented within an incremental, goal-directed/predictive model.
%R 10.5087/dad.2011.109
%U https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.7/
%U https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2011.109
%P 199-233

Markdown (Informal)

[Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing](https://aclanthology.org/2011.dnd-2.7/) (Gregoromichelaki et al., DND 2011)

• Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing (Gregoromichelaki et al., DND 2011)

ACL

• Eleni Gregoromichelaki, Ruth Kempson, Matthew Purver, Gregory J. Mills, Ronnie Cann, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, and Patrick G. T. Healey. 2011. Incrementality and intention-recognition in utterance processing. Dialogue & Discourse, 2:199–233.