<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="tatsumi-etal-2012-good">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Midori</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Tatsumi</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Takako</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Aikawa</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Kentaro</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Yamamoto</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Hitoshi</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Isahara</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2012-oct 28</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Machine Translation in the Americas</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">San Diego, California, USA</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>This paper is a partial report of a research effort on evaluating the effect of crowd-sourced post-editing. We first discuss the emerging trend of crowd-sourced post-editing of machine translation output, along with its benefits and drawbacks. Second, we describe the pilot study we have conducted on a platform that facilitates crowd-sourced post-editing. Finally, we provide our plans for further studies to have more insight on how effective crowd-sourced post-editing is.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">tatsumi-etal-2012-good</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2012.amta-wptp.8</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2012-oct 28</date>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations
%A Tatsumi, Midori
%A Aikawa, Takako
%A Yamamoto, Kentaro
%A Isahara, Hitoshi
%S Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice
%D 2012
%8 oct 28
%I Association for Machine Translation in the Americas
%C San Diego, California, USA
%F tatsumi-etal-2012-good
%X This paper is a partial report of a research effort on evaluating the effect of crowd-sourced post-editing. We first discuss the emerging trend of crowd-sourced post-editing of machine translation output, along with its benefits and drawbacks. Second, we describe the pilot study we have conducted on a platform that facilitates crowd-sourced post-editing. Finally, we provide our plans for further studies to have more insight on how effective crowd-sourced post-editing is.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2012.amta-wptp.8

Markdown (Informal)

[How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations](https://aclanthology.org/2012.amta-wptp.8) (Tatsumi et al., AMTA 2012)

• How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations (Tatsumi et al., AMTA 2012)

ACL

• Midori Tatsumi, Takako Aikawa, Kentaro Yamamoto, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2012. How Good Is Crowd Post-Editing? Its Potential and Limitations. In Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice, San Diego, California, USA. Association for Machine Translation in the Americas.