@article{benamara-etal-2016-evaluation,
title = "Evaluation in Discourse: a Corpus-Based Study",
author = "Benamara, Farah and
Asher, Nicholas and
Mathieu, Yvette Yannick and
Popescu, Vladimir and
Chardon, Baptiste",
editor = "Poesio, Massimo and
Eugenio, Barbara Di and
Schlangen, David and
Williams, Jason D. and
Raux, Antoine and
Henderson, Matthew and
Ginzburg, Jonathan",
journal = "Dialogue {\&} Discourse",
volume = "7",
month = jan,
year = "2016",
address = "Bielefeld, Germany",
publisher = "University of Bielefeld",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2016.dnd-7.8/",
doi = "10.5087/dad.2016.101",
pages = "1--49",
abstract = "This paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus that explores the impact of discourse structure on sentiment analysis with a study of movie reviews in French and in English as well as letters to the editor in French. While annotating opinions at the expression, the sentence or the document level is a well-established task and relatively straightforward, discourse annotation remains difficult, especially for non-experts. Therefore, combining both annotations poses several methodological problems that we address here. We propose a multi-layered annotation scheme that includes: the complete discourse structure according to the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, the opinion orientation of elementary discourse units and opinion expressions, and their associated features. We detail each layer, explore the interactions between them and discuss our results. In particular, we examine the correlation between discourse and semantic category of opinion expressions, the impact of discourse relations on both subjectivity and polarity analysis and the impact of discourse on the determination of the overall opinion of a document. Our results demonstrate that discourse is an important cue for sentiment analysis, at least for the corpus genres we have studied."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="benamara-etal-2016-evaluation">
<titleInfo>
<title>Evaluation in Discourse: a Corpus-Based Study</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Farah</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Benamara</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nicholas</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Asher</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yvette</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Yannick</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mathieu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vladimir</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Popescu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Baptiste</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chardon</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2016-01</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Dialogue & Discourse</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>University of Bielefeld</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Bielefeld, Germany</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus that explores the impact of discourse structure on sentiment analysis with a study of movie reviews in French and in English as well as letters to the editor in French. While annotating opinions at the expression, the sentence or the document level is a well-established task and relatively straightforward, discourse annotation remains difficult, especially for non-experts. Therefore, combining both annotations poses several methodological problems that we address here. We propose a multi-layered annotation scheme that includes: the complete discourse structure according to the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, the opinion orientation of elementary discourse units and opinion expressions, and their associated features. We detail each layer, explore the interactions between them and discuss our results. In particular, we examine the correlation between discourse and semantic category of opinion expressions, the impact of discourse relations on both subjectivity and polarity analysis and the impact of discourse on the determination of the overall opinion of a document. Our results demonstrate that discourse is an important cue for sentiment analysis, at least for the corpus genres we have studied.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">benamara-etal-2016-evaluation</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.5087/dad.2016.101</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2016.dnd-7.8/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2016-01</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>7</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1</start>
<end>49</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Evaluation in Discourse: a Corpus-Based Study
%A Benamara, Farah
%A Asher, Nicholas
%A Mathieu, Yvette Yannick
%A Popescu, Vladimir
%A Chardon, Baptiste
%J Dialogue & Discourse
%D 2016
%8 January
%V 7
%I University of Bielefeld
%C Bielefeld, Germany
%F benamara-etal-2016-evaluation
%X This paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus that explores the impact of discourse structure on sentiment analysis with a study of movie reviews in French and in English as well as letters to the editor in French. While annotating opinions at the expression, the sentence or the document level is a well-established task and relatively straightforward, discourse annotation remains difficult, especially for non-experts. Therefore, combining both annotations poses several methodological problems that we address here. We propose a multi-layered annotation scheme that includes: the complete discourse structure according to the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, the opinion orientation of elementary discourse units and opinion expressions, and their associated features. We detail each layer, explore the interactions between them and discuss our results. In particular, we examine the correlation between discourse and semantic category of opinion expressions, the impact of discourse relations on both subjectivity and polarity analysis and the impact of discourse on the determination of the overall opinion of a document. Our results demonstrate that discourse is an important cue for sentiment analysis, at least for the corpus genres we have studied.
%R 10.5087/dad.2016.101
%U https://aclanthology.org/2016.dnd-7.8/
%U https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2016.101
%P 1-49
Markdown (Informal)
[Evaluation in Discourse: a Corpus-Based Study](https://aclanthology.org/2016.dnd-7.8/) (Benamara et al., DND 2016)
ACL