<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="ward-gallardo-2017-non">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Non-Native Differences in Prosodic-Construction Use</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Nigel</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">G</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Ward</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Paola</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Gallardo</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2017-01</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Dialogue &amp; Discourse</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <issuance>continuing</issuance>
            <publisher>University of Bielefeld</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Bielefeld, Germany</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
        <genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Many language learners never acquire truly native-sounding prosody. Previous work has suggested that this involves skill deficits in the dialog-related uses of prosody, and may be attributable to weaknesses with specific prosodic constructions. Using semi-automated methods, we identified 32 of the most common prosodic constructions in English dialog. Examining 90 minutes of six advanced native-Spanish learners conversing in English, there were differences, notably regarding swift turn-taking, alignment, and empathy, but overall their uses of prosodic constructions were largely similar to those of native speakers.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">ward-gallardo-2017-non</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.5087/dad.2017.101</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2017.dnd-8.15/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2017-01</date>
        <detail type="volume"><number>8</number></detail>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>1</start>
            <end>30</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Journal Article
%T Non-Native Differences in Prosodic-Construction Use
%A Ward, Nigel G.
%A Gallardo, Paola
%J Dialogue & Discourse
%D 2017
%8 January
%V 8
%I University of Bielefeld
%C Bielefeld, Germany
%F ward-gallardo-2017-non
%X Many language learners never acquire truly native-sounding prosody. Previous work has suggested that this involves skill deficits in the dialog-related uses of prosody, and may be attributable to weaknesses with specific prosodic constructions. Using semi-automated methods, we identified 32 of the most common prosodic constructions in English dialog. Examining 90 minutes of six advanced native-Spanish learners conversing in English, there were differences, notably regarding swift turn-taking, alignment, and empathy, but overall their uses of prosodic constructions were largely similar to those of native speakers.
%R 10.5087/dad.2017.101
%U https://aclanthology.org/2017.dnd-8.15/
%U https://doi.org/10.5087/dad.2017.101
%P 1-30

Markdown (Informal)

[Non-Native Differences in Prosodic-Construction Use](https://aclanthology.org/2017.dnd-8.15/) (Ward & Gallardo, DND 2017)

• Non-Native Differences in Prosodic-Construction Use (Ward & Gallardo, DND 2017)

ACL

• Nigel G. Ward and Paola Gallardo. 2017. Non-Native Differences in Prosodic-Construction Use. Dialogue & Discourse, 8:1–30.