<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="leins-etal-2020-give">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Kobi</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Leins</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Jey</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Han</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Lau</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Timothy</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Baldwin</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2020-07</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Dan</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Jurafsky</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Joyce</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Chai</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Natalie</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Schluter</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Joel</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Tetreault</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>As part of growing NLP capabilities, coupled with an awareness of the ethical dimensions of research, questions have been raised about whether particular datasets and tasks should be deemed off-limits for NLP research. We examine this question with respect to a paper on automatic legal sentencing from EMNLP 2019 which was a source of some debate, in asking whether the paper should have been allowed to be published, who should have been charged with making such a decision, and on what basis. We focus in particular on the role of data statements in ethically assessing research, but also discuss the topic of dual use, and examine the outcomes of similar debates in other scientific disciplines.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">leins-etal-2020-give</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.261</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.261</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2020-07</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>2908</start>
            <end>2913</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?
%A Leins, Kobi
%A Lau, Jey Han
%A Baldwin, Timothy
%Y Jurafsky, Dan
%Y Chai, Joyce
%Y Schluter, Natalie
%Y Tetreault, Joel
%S Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2020
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F leins-etal-2020-give
%X As part of growing NLP capabilities, coupled with an awareness of the ethical dimensions of research, questions have been raised about whether particular datasets and tasks should be deemed off-limits for NLP research. We examine this question with respect to a paper on automatic legal sentencing from EMNLP 2019 which was a source of some debate, in asking whether the paper should have been allowed to be published, who should have been charged with making such a decision, and on what basis. We focus in particular on the role of data statements in ethically assessing research, but also discuss the topic of dual use, and examine the outcomes of similar debates in other scientific disciplines.
%R 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.261
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.261
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.261
%P 2908-2913

Markdown (Informal)

[Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.261) (Leins et al., ACL 2020)

• Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis? (Leins et al., ACL 2020)

ACL

• Kobi Leins, Jey Han Lau, and Timothy Baldwin. 2020. Give Me Convenience and Give Her Death: Who Should Decide What Uses of NLP are Appropriate, and on What Basis?. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 2908–2913, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.