<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="blodgett-etal-2020-language">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Su</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Lin</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Blodgett</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Solon</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Barocas</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Hal</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Daumé III</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Hanna</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Wallach</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2020-07</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Dan</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Jurafsky</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Joyce</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Chai</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Natalie</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Schluter</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Joel</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Tetreault</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>We survey 146 papers analyzing “bias” in NLP systems, finding that their motivations are often vague, inconsistent, and lacking in normative reasoning, despite the fact that analyzing “bias” is an inherently normative process. We further find that these papers’ proposed quantitative techniques for measuring or mitigating “bias” are poorly matched to their motivations and do not engage with the relevant literature outside of NLP. Based on these findings, we describe the beginnings of a path forward by proposing three recommendations that should guide work analyzing “bias” in NLP systems. These recommendations rest on a greater recognition of the relationships between language and social hierarchies, encouraging researchers and practitioners to articulate their conceptualizations of “bias”—i.e., what kinds of system behaviors are harmful, in what ways, to whom, and why, as well as the normative reasoning underlying these statements—and to center work around the lived experiences of members of communities affected by NLP systems, while interrogating and reimagining the power relations between technologists and such communities.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">blodgett-etal-2020-language</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.485</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2020-07</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>5454</start>
            <end>5476</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP
%A Blodgett, Su Lin
%A Barocas, Solon
%A Daumé III, Hal
%A Wallach, Hanna
%Y Jurafsky, Dan
%Y Chai, Joyce
%Y Schluter, Natalie
%Y Tetreault, Joel
%S Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
%D 2020
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F blodgett-etal-2020-language
%X We survey 146 papers analyzing “bias” in NLP systems, finding that their motivations are often vague, inconsistent, and lacking in normative reasoning, despite the fact that analyzing “bias” is an inherently normative process. We further find that these papers’ proposed quantitative techniques for measuring or mitigating “bias” are poorly matched to their motivations and do not engage with the relevant literature outside of NLP. Based on these findings, we describe the beginnings of a path forward by proposing three recommendations that should guide work analyzing “bias” in NLP systems. These recommendations rest on a greater recognition of the relationships between language and social hierarchies, encouraging researchers and practitioners to articulate their conceptualizations of “bias”—i.e., what kinds of system behaviors are harmful, in what ways, to whom, and why, as well as the normative reasoning underlying these statements—and to center work around the lived experiences of members of communities affected by NLP systems, while interrogating and reimagining the power relations between technologists and such communities.
%R 10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.485
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.485
%P 5454-5476

Markdown (Informal)

[Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.485) (Blodgett et al., ACL 2020)

• Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP (Blodgett et al., ACL 2020)

ACL

• Su Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, and Hanna Wallach. 2020. Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of “Bias” in NLP. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 5454–5476, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.