<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="kurrek-etal-2020-towards">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy and Large-Scale Annotated Corpus for Online Slur Usage</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Jana</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Kurrek</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Haji</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Mohammad</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Saleem</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Derek</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Ruths</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2020-11</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Abusive language classifiers have been shown to exhibit bias against women and racial minorities. Since these models are trained on data that is collected using keywords, they tend to exhibit a high sensitivity towards pejoratives. As a result, comments written by victims of abuse are frequently labelled as hateful, even if they discuss or reclaim slurs. Any attempt to address bias in keyword-based corpora requires a better understanding of pejorative language, as well as an equitable representation of targeted users in data collection. We make two main contributions to this end. First, we provide an annotation guide that outlines 4 main categories of online slur usage, which we further divide into a total of 12 sub-categories. Second, we present a publicly available corpus based on our taxonomy, with 39.8k human annotated comments extracted from Reddit. This corpus was annotated by a diverse cohort of coders, with Shannon equitability indices of 0.90, 0.92, and 0.87 across sexuality, ethnicity, and gender. Taken together, our taxonomy and corpus allow researchers to evaluate classifiers on a wider range of speech containing slurs.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">kurrek-etal-2020-towards</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.17</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.alw-1.17</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2020-11</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>138</start>
            <end>149</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy and Large-Scale Annotated Corpus for Online Slur Usage
%A Kurrek, Jana
%A Saleem, Haji Mohammad
%A Ruths, Derek
%S Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms
%D 2020
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F kurrek-etal-2020-towards
%X Abusive language classifiers have been shown to exhibit bias against women and racial minorities. Since these models are trained on data that is collected using keywords, they tend to exhibit a high sensitivity towards pejoratives. As a result, comments written by victims of abuse are frequently labelled as hateful, even if they discuss or reclaim slurs. Any attempt to address bias in keyword-based corpora requires a better understanding of pejorative language, as well as an equitable representation of targeted users in data collection. We make two main contributions to this end. First, we provide an annotation guide that outlines 4 main categories of online slur usage, which we further divide into a total of 12 sub-categories. Second, we present a publicly available corpus based on our taxonomy, with 39.8k human annotated comments extracted from Reddit. This corpus was annotated by a diverse cohort of coders, with Shannon equitability indices of 0.90, 0.92, and 0.87 across sexuality, ethnicity, and gender. Taken together, our taxonomy and corpus allow researchers to evaluate classifiers on a wider range of speech containing slurs.
%R 10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.17
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.alw-1.17
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.17
%P 138-149

Markdown (Informal)

[Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy and Large-Scale Annotated Corpus for Online Slur Usage](https://aclanthology.org/2020.alw-1.17) (Kurrek et al., ALW 2020)

• Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy and Large-Scale Annotated Corpus for Online Slur Usage (Kurrek et al., ALW 2020)

ACL

• Jana Kurrek, Haji Mohammad Saleem, and Derek Ruths. 2020. Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy and Large-Scale Annotated Corpus for Online Slur Usage. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms, pages 138–149, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.