@inproceedings{lauscher-etal-2020-rhetoric,
title = "Rhetoric, Logic, and Dialectic: Advancing Theory-based Argument Quality Assessment in Natural Language Processing",
author = "Lauscher, Anne and
Ng, Lily and
Napoles, Courtney and
Tetreault, Joel",
editor = "Scott, Donia and
Bel, Nuria and
Zong, Chengqing",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
month = dec,
year = "2020",
address = "Barcelona, Spain (Online)",
publisher = "International Committee on Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.402",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.402",
pages = "4563--4574",
abstract = "Though preceding work in computational argument quality (AQ) mostly focuses on assessing overall AQ, researchers agree that writers would benefit from feedback targeting individual dimensions of argumentation theory. However, a large-scale theory-based corpus and corresponding computational models are missing. We fill this gap by conducting an extensive analysis covering three diverse domains of online argumentative writing and presenting GAQCorpus: the first large-scale English multi-domain (community Q{\&}A forums, debate forums, review forums) corpus annotated with theory-based AQ scores. We then propose the first computational approaches to theory-based assessment, which can serve as strong baselines for future work. We demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale AQ annotation, show that exploiting relations between dimensions yields performance improvements, and explore the synergies between theory-based prediction and practical AQ assessment.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="lauscher-etal-2020-rhetoric">
<titleInfo>
<title>Rhetoric, Logic, and Dialectic: Advancing Theory-based Argument Quality Assessment in Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anne</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lauscher</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lily</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ng</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Courtney</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Napoles</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Joel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tetreault</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Donia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Scott</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nuria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chengqing</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zong</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>International Committee on Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Barcelona, Spain (Online)</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Though preceding work in computational argument quality (AQ) mostly focuses on assessing overall AQ, researchers agree that writers would benefit from feedback targeting individual dimensions of argumentation theory. However, a large-scale theory-based corpus and corresponding computational models are missing. We fill this gap by conducting an extensive analysis covering three diverse domains of online argumentative writing and presenting GAQCorpus: the first large-scale English multi-domain (community Q&A forums, debate forums, review forums) corpus annotated with theory-based AQ scores. We then propose the first computational approaches to theory-based assessment, which can serve as strong baselines for future work. We demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale AQ annotation, show that exploiting relations between dimensions yields performance improvements, and explore the synergies between theory-based prediction and practical AQ assessment.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">lauscher-etal-2020-rhetoric</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.402</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.402</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>4563</start>
<end>4574</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Rhetoric, Logic, and Dialectic: Advancing Theory-based Argument Quality Assessment in Natural Language Processing
%A Lauscher, Anne
%A Ng, Lily
%A Napoles, Courtney
%A Tetreault, Joel
%Y Scott, Donia
%Y Bel, Nuria
%Y Zong, Chengqing
%S Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
%D 2020
%8 December
%I International Committee on Computational Linguistics
%C Barcelona, Spain (Online)
%F lauscher-etal-2020-rhetoric
%X Though preceding work in computational argument quality (AQ) mostly focuses on assessing overall AQ, researchers agree that writers would benefit from feedback targeting individual dimensions of argumentation theory. However, a large-scale theory-based corpus and corresponding computational models are missing. We fill this gap by conducting an extensive analysis covering three diverse domains of online argumentative writing and presenting GAQCorpus: the first large-scale English multi-domain (community Q&A forums, debate forums, review forums) corpus annotated with theory-based AQ scores. We then propose the first computational approaches to theory-based assessment, which can serve as strong baselines for future work. We demonstrate the feasibility of large-scale AQ annotation, show that exploiting relations between dimensions yields performance improvements, and explore the synergies between theory-based prediction and practical AQ assessment.
%R 10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.402
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.402
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.coling-main.402
%P 4563-4574
Markdown (Informal)
[Rhetoric, Logic, and Dialectic: Advancing Theory-based Argument Quality Assessment in Natural Language Processing](https://aclanthology.org/2020.coling-main.402) (Lauscher et al., COLING 2020)
ACL