How well does surprisal explain N400 amplitude under different experimental conditions?

James Michaelov, Benjamin Bergen


Abstract
We investigate the extent to which word surprisal can be used to predict a neural measure of human language processing difficulty—the N400. To do this, we use recurrent neural networks to calculate the surprisal of stimuli from previously published neurolinguistic studies of the N400. We find that surprisal can predict N400 amplitude in a wide range of cases, and the cases where it cannot do so provide valuable insight into the neurocognitive processes underlying the response.
Anthology ID:
2020.conll-1.53
Volume:
Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning
Month:
November
Year:
2020
Address:
Online
Editors:
Raquel Fernández, Tal Linzen
Venue:
CoNLL
SIG:
SIGNLL
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
652–663
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2020.conll-1.53
DOI:
10.18653/v1/2020.conll-1.53
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
James Michaelov and Benjamin Bergen. 2020. How well does surprisal explain N400 amplitude under different experimental conditions?. In Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 652–663, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
How well does surprisal explain N400 amplitude under different experimental conditions? (Michaelov & Bergen, CoNLL 2020)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2020.conll-1.53.pdf
Code
 jmichaelov/does-surprisal-explain-n400