@inproceedings{vikram-kulkarni-2020-free,
title = "Free Word Order in {S}anskrit and Well-nestedness",
author = "Vikram, Sanal and
Kulkarni, Amba",
editor = "Bhattacharyya, Pushpak and
Sharma, Dipti Misra and
Sangal, Rajeev",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON)",
month = dec,
year = "2020",
address = "Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India",
publisher = "NLP Association of India (NLPAI)",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.icon-main.41",
pages = "308--316",
abstract = "The common wisdom about Sanskrit is that it is free word order language. This word order poses challenges such as handling non-projectivity in parsing. The earlier works on the word order of Sanskrit have shown that there are syntactic structures in Sanskrit which cannot be covered under even the non-planarity. In this paper, we study these structures further to investigate if they can fall under well-nestedness or not. A small manually tagged corpus of the verses of {\'S}r{\=\i}mad-Bhagavad-G{\=\i}t{\=a} was considered for this study. It was noticed that there are as many well-nested trees as there are ill-nested ones. From the linguistic point of view, we could get a list of relations that are involved in the planarity violations. All these relations had one thing in common - that they have unilateral expectancy. It was this loose binding, as against the mutual expectancy with certain other relations, that allowed them to cross the phrasal boundaries.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="vikram-kulkarni-2020-free">
<titleInfo>
<title>Free Word Order in Sanskrit and Well-nestedness</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sanal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vikram</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Amba</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kulkarni</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pushpak</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bhattacharyya</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dipti</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Misra</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sharma</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Rajeev</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sangal</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>NLP Association of India (NLPAI)</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The common wisdom about Sanskrit is that it is free word order language. This word order poses challenges such as handling non-projectivity in parsing. The earlier works on the word order of Sanskrit have shown that there are syntactic structures in Sanskrit which cannot be covered under even the non-planarity. In this paper, we study these structures further to investigate if they can fall under well-nestedness or not. A small manually tagged corpus of the verses of Śrīmad-Bhagavad-Gītā was considered for this study. It was noticed that there are as many well-nested trees as there are ill-nested ones. From the linguistic point of view, we could get a list of relations that are involved in the planarity violations. All these relations had one thing in common - that they have unilateral expectancy. It was this loose binding, as against the mutual expectancy with certain other relations, that allowed them to cross the phrasal boundaries.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">vikram-kulkarni-2020-free</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.icon-main.41</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>308</start>
<end>316</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Free Word Order in Sanskrit and Well-nestedness
%A Vikram, Sanal
%A Kulkarni, Amba
%Y Bhattacharyya, Pushpak
%Y Sharma, Dipti Misra
%Y Sangal, Rajeev
%S Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON)
%D 2020
%8 December
%I NLP Association of India (NLPAI)
%C Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India
%F vikram-kulkarni-2020-free
%X The common wisdom about Sanskrit is that it is free word order language. This word order poses challenges such as handling non-projectivity in parsing. The earlier works on the word order of Sanskrit have shown that there are syntactic structures in Sanskrit which cannot be covered under even the non-planarity. In this paper, we study these structures further to investigate if they can fall under well-nestedness or not. A small manually tagged corpus of the verses of Śrīmad-Bhagavad-Gītā was considered for this study. It was noticed that there are as many well-nested trees as there are ill-nested ones. From the linguistic point of view, we could get a list of relations that are involved in the planarity violations. All these relations had one thing in common - that they have unilateral expectancy. It was this loose binding, as against the mutual expectancy with certain other relations, that allowed them to cross the phrasal boundaries.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.icon-main.41
%P 308-316
Markdown (Informal)
[Free Word Order in Sanskrit and Well-nestedness](https://aclanthology.org/2020.icon-main.41) (Vikram & Kulkarni, ICON 2020)
ACL
- Sanal Vikram and Amba Kulkarni. 2020. Free Word Order in Sanskrit and Well-nestedness. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON), pages 308–316, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Patna, India. NLP Association of India (NLPAI).