@inproceedings{hutin-etal-2020-lenition-fortition,
title = "Lenition and Fortition of Stop Codas in {R}omanian",
author = "Hutin, Mathilde and
Niculescu, Oana and
Vasilescu, Ioana and
Lamel, Lori and
Adda-Decker, Martine",
editor = "Beermann, Dorothee and
Besacier, Laurent and
Sakti, Sakriani and
Soria, Claudia",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced languages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL)",
month = may,
year = "2020",
address = "Marseille, France",
publisher = "European Language Resources association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2020.sltu-1.31",
pages = "226--234",
abstract = "The present paper aims at providing a first study of lenition- and fortition-type phenomena in coda position in Romanian, a language that can be considered as less-resourced. Our data show that there are two contexts for devoicing in Romanian: before a voiceless obstruent, which means that there is regressive voicelessness assimilation in the language, and before pause, which means that there is a tendency towards final devoicing proper. The data also show that non-canonical voicing is an instance of voicing assimilation, as it is observed mainly before voiced consonants (voiced obstruents and sonorants alike). Two conclusions can be drawn from our analyses. First, from a phonetic point of view, the two devoicing phenomena exhibit the same behavior regarding place of articulation of the coda, while voicing assimilation displays the reverse tendency. In particular, alveolars, which tend to devoice the most, also voice the least. Second, the two assimilation processes have similarities that could distinguish them from final devoicing as such. Final devoicing seems to be sensitive to speech style and gender of the speaker, while assimilation processes do not. This may indicate that the two kinds of processes are phonologized at two different degrees in the language, assimilation being more accepted and generalized than final devoicing.",
language = "English",
ISBN = "979-10-95546-35-1",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="hutin-etal-2020-lenition-fortition">
<titleInfo>
<title>Lenition and Fortition of Stop Codas in Romanian</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mathilde</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hutin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Oana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Niculescu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ioana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vasilescu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Lori</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lamel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Martine</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Adda-Decker</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020-05</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<language>
<languageTerm type="text">English</languageTerm>
<languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
</language>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced languages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dorothee</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Beermann</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laurent</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Besacier</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sakriani</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sakti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Claudia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Soria</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>European Language Resources association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Marseille, France</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-10-95546-35-1</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The present paper aims at providing a first study of lenition- and fortition-type phenomena in coda position in Romanian, a language that can be considered as less-resourced. Our data show that there are two contexts for devoicing in Romanian: before a voiceless obstruent, which means that there is regressive voicelessness assimilation in the language, and before pause, which means that there is a tendency towards final devoicing proper. The data also show that non-canonical voicing is an instance of voicing assimilation, as it is observed mainly before voiced consonants (voiced obstruents and sonorants alike). Two conclusions can be drawn from our analyses. First, from a phonetic point of view, the two devoicing phenomena exhibit the same behavior regarding place of articulation of the coda, while voicing assimilation displays the reverse tendency. In particular, alveolars, which tend to devoice the most, also voice the least. Second, the two assimilation processes have similarities that could distinguish them from final devoicing as such. Final devoicing seems to be sensitive to speech style and gender of the speaker, while assimilation processes do not. This may indicate that the two kinds of processes are phonologized at two different degrees in the language, assimilation being more accepted and generalized than final devoicing.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">hutin-etal-2020-lenition-fortition</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2020.sltu-1.31</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020-05</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>226</start>
<end>234</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Lenition and Fortition of Stop Codas in Romanian
%A Hutin, Mathilde
%A Niculescu, Oana
%A Vasilescu, Ioana
%A Lamel, Lori
%A Adda-Decker, Martine
%Y Beermann, Dorothee
%Y Besacier, Laurent
%Y Sakti, Sakriani
%Y Soria, Claudia
%S Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced languages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL)
%D 2020
%8 May
%I European Language Resources association
%C Marseille, France
%@ 979-10-95546-35-1
%G English
%F hutin-etal-2020-lenition-fortition
%X The present paper aims at providing a first study of lenition- and fortition-type phenomena in coda position in Romanian, a language that can be considered as less-resourced. Our data show that there are two contexts for devoicing in Romanian: before a voiceless obstruent, which means that there is regressive voicelessness assimilation in the language, and before pause, which means that there is a tendency towards final devoicing proper. The data also show that non-canonical voicing is an instance of voicing assimilation, as it is observed mainly before voiced consonants (voiced obstruents and sonorants alike). Two conclusions can be drawn from our analyses. First, from a phonetic point of view, the two devoicing phenomena exhibit the same behavior regarding place of articulation of the coda, while voicing assimilation displays the reverse tendency. In particular, alveolars, which tend to devoice the most, also voice the least. Second, the two assimilation processes have similarities that could distinguish them from final devoicing as such. Final devoicing seems to be sensitive to speech style and gender of the speaker, while assimilation processes do not. This may indicate that the two kinds of processes are phonologized at two different degrees in the language, assimilation being more accepted and generalized than final devoicing.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2020.sltu-1.31
%P 226-234
Markdown (Informal)
[Lenition and Fortition of Stop Codas in Romanian](https://aclanthology.org/2020.sltu-1.31) (Hutin et al., SLTU 2020)
ACL
- Mathilde Hutin, Oana Niculescu, Ioana Vasilescu, Lori Lamel, and Martine Adda-Decker. 2020. Lenition and Fortition of Stop Codas in Romanian. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint Workshop on Spoken Language Technologies for Under-resourced languages (SLTU) and Collaboration and Computing for Under-Resourced Languages (CCURL), pages 226–234, Marseille, France. European Language Resources association.