@inproceedings{sahai-etal-2021-breaking,
title = "Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online Discussions",
author = "Sahai, Saumya and
Balalau, Oana and
Horincar, Roxana",
editor = "Zong, Chengqing and
Xia, Fei and
Li, Wenjie and
Navigli, Roberto",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = aug,
year = "2021",
address = "Online",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.53",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.53",
pages = "644--657",
abstract = "People debate on a variety of topics on online platforms such as Reddit, or Facebook. Debates can be lengthy, with users exchanging a wealth of information and opinions. However, conversations do not always go smoothly, and users sometimes engage in unsound argumentation techniques to prove a claim. These techniques are called fallacies. Fallacies are persuasive arguments that provide insufficient or incorrect evidence to support the claim. In this paper, we study the most frequent fallacies on Reddit, and we present them using the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. We construct a new annotated dataset of fallacies, using user comments containing fallacy mentions as noisy labels, and cleaning the data via crowdsourcing. Finally, we study the task of classifying fallacies using neural models. We find that generally the models perform better in the presence of conversational context. We have released the data and the code at github.com/sahaisaumya/informal{\_}fallacies.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="sahai-etal-2021-breaking">
<titleInfo>
<title>Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online Discussions</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Saumya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sahai</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Oana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Balalau</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roxana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Horincar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2021-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Chengqing</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zong</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Fei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xia</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Wenjie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roberto</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Navigli</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Online</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>People debate on a variety of topics on online platforms such as Reddit, or Facebook. Debates can be lengthy, with users exchanging a wealth of information and opinions. However, conversations do not always go smoothly, and users sometimes engage in unsound argumentation techniques to prove a claim. These techniques are called fallacies. Fallacies are persuasive arguments that provide insufficient or incorrect evidence to support the claim. In this paper, we study the most frequent fallacies on Reddit, and we present them using the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. We construct a new annotated dataset of fallacies, using user comments containing fallacy mentions as noisy labels, and cleaning the data via crowdsourcing. Finally, we study the task of classifying fallacies using neural models. We find that generally the models perform better in the presence of conversational context. We have released the data and the code at github.com/sahaisaumya/informal_fallacies.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">sahai-etal-2021-breaking</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.53</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.53</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2021-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>644</start>
<end>657</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online Discussions
%A Sahai, Saumya
%A Balalau, Oana
%A Horincar, Roxana
%Y Zong, Chengqing
%Y Xia, Fei
%Y Li, Wenjie
%Y Navigli, Roberto
%S Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)
%D 2021
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Online
%F sahai-etal-2021-breaking
%X People debate on a variety of topics on online platforms such as Reddit, or Facebook. Debates can be lengthy, with users exchanging a wealth of information and opinions. However, conversations do not always go smoothly, and users sometimes engage in unsound argumentation techniques to prove a claim. These techniques are called fallacies. Fallacies are persuasive arguments that provide insufficient or incorrect evidence to support the claim. In this paper, we study the most frequent fallacies on Reddit, and we present them using the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. We construct a new annotated dataset of fallacies, using user comments containing fallacy mentions as noisy labels, and cleaning the data via crowdsourcing. Finally, we study the task of classifying fallacies using neural models. We find that generally the models perform better in the presence of conversational context. We have released the data and the code at github.com/sahaisaumya/informal_fallacies.
%R 10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.53
%U https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.53
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.53
%P 644-657
Markdown (Informal)
[Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online Discussions](https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.53) (Sahai et al., ACL-IJCNLP 2021)
ACL
- Saumya Sahai, Oana Balalau, and Roxana Horincar. 2021. Breaking Down the Invisible Wall of Informal Fallacies in Online Discussions. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 644–657, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.