%0 Conference Proceedings %T Predicting Moderation of Deliberative Arguments: Is Argument Quality the Key? %A Falk, Neele %A Jundi, Iman %A Vecchi, Eva Maria %A Lapesa, Gabriella %Y Al-Khatib, Khalid %Y Hou, Yufang %Y Stede, Manfred %S Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Argument Mining %D 2021 %8 November %I Association for Computational Linguistics %C Punta Cana, Dominican Republic %F falk-etal-2021-predicting %X Human moderation is commonly employed in deliberative contexts (argumentation and discussion targeting a shared decision on an issue relevant to a group, e.g., citizens arguing on how to employ a shared budget). As the scale of discussion enlarges in online settings, the overall discussion quality risks to drop and moderation becomes more important to assist participants in having a cooperative and productive interaction. The scale also makes it more important to employ NLP methods for(semi-)automatic moderation, e.g. to prioritize when moderation is most needed. In this work, we make the first steps towards (semi-)automatic moderation by using state-of-the-art classification models to predict which posts require moderation, showing that while the task is undoubtedly difficult, performance is significantly above baseline. We further investigate whether argument quality is a key indicator of the need for moderation, showing that surprisingly, high quality arguments also trigger moderation. We make our code and data publicly available. %R 10.18653/v1/2021.argmining-1.13 %U https://aclanthology.org/2021.argmining-1.13 %U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.argmining-1.13 %P 133-141