@inproceedings{schuff-etal-2021-external,
title = "Does External Knowledge Help Explainable Natural Language Inference? Automatic Evaluation vs. Human Ratings",
author = "Schuff, Hendrik and
Yang, Hsiu-Yu and
Adel, Heike and
Vu, Ngoc Thang",
editor = "Bastings, Jasmijn and
Belinkov, Yonatan and
Dupoux, Emmanuel and
Giulianelli, Mario and
Hupkes, Dieuwke and
Pinter, Yuval and
Sajjad, Hassan",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP",
month = nov,
year = "2021",
address = "Punta Cana, Dominican Republic",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3",
pages = "26--41",
abstract = "Natural language inference (NLI) requires models to learn and apply commonsense knowledge. These reasoning abilities are particularly important for explainable NLI systems that generate a natural language explanation in addition to their label prediction. The integration of external knowledge has been shown to improve NLI systems, here we investigate whether it can also improve their explanation capabilities. For this, we investigate different sources of external knowledge and evaluate the performance of our models on in-domain data as well as on special transfer datasets that are designed to assess fine-grained reasoning capabilities. We find that different sources of knowledge have a different effect on reasoning abilities, for example, implicit knowledge stored in language models can hinder reasoning on numbers and negations. Finally, we conduct the largest and most fine-grained explainable NLI crowdsourcing study to date. It reveals that even large differences in automatic performance scores do neither reflect in human ratings of label, explanation, commonsense nor grammar correctness."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="schuff-etal-2021-external">
<titleInfo>
<title>Does External Knowledge Help Explainable Natural Language Inference? Automatic Evaluation vs. Human Ratings</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hendrik</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schuff</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hsiu-Yu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Yang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Heike</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Adel</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ngoc</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Thang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2021-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fourth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jasmijn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bastings</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yonatan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Belinkov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Emmanuel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dupoux</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mario</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Giulianelli</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dieuwke</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hupkes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yuval</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pinter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hassan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sajjad</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Punta Cana, Dominican Republic</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Natural language inference (NLI) requires models to learn and apply commonsense knowledge. These reasoning abilities are particularly important for explainable NLI systems that generate a natural language explanation in addition to their label prediction. The integration of external knowledge has been shown to improve NLI systems, here we investigate whether it can also improve their explanation capabilities. For this, we investigate different sources of external knowledge and evaluate the performance of our models on in-domain data as well as on special transfer datasets that are designed to assess fine-grained reasoning capabilities. We find that different sources of knowledge have a different effect on reasoning abilities, for example, implicit knowledge stored in language models can hinder reasoning on numbers and negations. Finally, we conduct the largest and most fine-grained explainable NLI crowdsourcing study to date. It reveals that even large differences in automatic performance scores do neither reflect in human ratings of label, explanation, commonsense nor grammar correctness.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">schuff-etal-2021-external</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2021-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>26</start>
<end>41</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Does External Knowledge Help Explainable Natural Language Inference? Automatic Evaluation vs. Human Ratings
%A Schuff, Hendrik
%A Yang, Hsiu-Yu
%A Adel, Heike
%A Vu, Ngoc Thang
%Y Bastings, Jasmijn
%Y Belinkov, Yonatan
%Y Dupoux, Emmanuel
%Y Giulianelli, Mario
%Y Hupkes, Dieuwke
%Y Pinter, Yuval
%Y Sajjad, Hassan
%S Proceedings of the Fourth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
%D 2021
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Punta Cana, Dominican Republic
%F schuff-etal-2021-external
%X Natural language inference (NLI) requires models to learn and apply commonsense knowledge. These reasoning abilities are particularly important for explainable NLI systems that generate a natural language explanation in addition to their label prediction. The integration of external knowledge has been shown to improve NLI systems, here we investigate whether it can also improve their explanation capabilities. For this, we investigate different sources of external knowledge and evaluate the performance of our models on in-domain data as well as on special transfer datasets that are designed to assess fine-grained reasoning capabilities. We find that different sources of knowledge have a different effect on reasoning abilities, for example, implicit knowledge stored in language models can hinder reasoning on numbers and negations. Finally, we conduct the largest and most fine-grained explainable NLI crowdsourcing study to date. It reveals that even large differences in automatic performance scores do neither reflect in human ratings of label, explanation, commonsense nor grammar correctness.
%R 10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3
%U https://aclanthology.org/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3
%P 26-41
Markdown (Informal)
[Does External Knowledge Help Explainable Natural Language Inference? Automatic Evaluation vs. Human Ratings](https://aclanthology.org/2021.blackboxnlp-1.3/) (Schuff et al., BlackboxNLP 2021)
ACL