@article{mertens-ruiter-2021-cognitive,
title = "Cognitive and social delays in the initiation of conversational repair",
author = "Mertens, Julia Beret and
Ruiter, Jan Peter De",
editor = "Healey, Patrick and
Eugenio, Barbara Di and
Demberg, Vera and
Ginzburg, Jonathan and
Georgila, Kallirroi and
Zeldes, Amir and
Poesio, Massimo",
journal = "Dialogue {\&} Discourse",
volume = "12",
month = mar,
year = "2021",
address = "Chicago, Illinois, USA",
publisher = "University of Illinois Chicago",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2021.dnd-12.9/",
doi = "10.5210/dad.2021.102",
pages = "21--44",
abstract = "The exact timing of a conversational turn conveys important information to a listener. Most turns are initiated within 250ms after the previous turn. However, interlocutors take longer to initiate certain types of turns: those that either require more cognitive processing or are socially dispreferred. Many dispreferred turns are also cognitively demanding, so it is difficult to attribute specific conversational delays to social or cognitive mechanisms. In this paper, we evaluate the relative contribution of cognitive and social variables to the timing of utterances in conversation. We focus on a type of turn that is socially dispreferred, cognitively demanding, and generally delayed: other-initiations of repair (OIRs). OIRs occur when a listener notices and decides to signal a comprehension problem (e.g., ``What?''). We analyzed the Floor Transfer Offsets of 456 OIRs, and found that interlocutors initiated OIRs later when trouble sources had weaker discourse context or were shorter, and when the OIR was more face-threatening. Our results suggest that both cognitive and social variables contribute to the timing of delayed utterances in conversation. We discuss how attention, prediction, planning, and social preference manifest in the timing of turns."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="mertens-ruiter-2021-cognitive">
<titleInfo>
<title>Cognitive and social delays in the initiation of conversational repair</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Julia</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Beret</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mertens</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Peter</namePart>
<namePart type="given">De</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ruiter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2021-03</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Dialogue & Discourse</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>University of Illinois Chicago</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Chicago, Illinois, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The exact timing of a conversational turn conveys important information to a listener. Most turns are initiated within 250ms after the previous turn. However, interlocutors take longer to initiate certain types of turns: those that either require more cognitive processing or are socially dispreferred. Many dispreferred turns are also cognitively demanding, so it is difficult to attribute specific conversational delays to social or cognitive mechanisms. In this paper, we evaluate the relative contribution of cognitive and social variables to the timing of utterances in conversation. We focus on a type of turn that is socially dispreferred, cognitively demanding, and generally delayed: other-initiations of repair (OIRs). OIRs occur when a listener notices and decides to signal a comprehension problem (e.g., “What?”). We analyzed the Floor Transfer Offsets of 456 OIRs, and found that interlocutors initiated OIRs later when trouble sources had weaker discourse context or were shorter, and when the OIR was more face-threatening. Our results suggest that both cognitive and social variables contribute to the timing of delayed utterances in conversation. We discuss how attention, prediction, planning, and social preference manifest in the timing of turns.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">mertens-ruiter-2021-cognitive</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.5210/dad.2021.102</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2021.dnd-12.9/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2021-03</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>12</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>21</start>
<end>44</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Cognitive and social delays in the initiation of conversational repair
%A Mertens, Julia Beret
%A Ruiter, Jan Peter De
%J Dialogue & Discourse
%D 2021
%8 March
%V 12
%I University of Illinois Chicago
%C Chicago, Illinois, USA
%F mertens-ruiter-2021-cognitive
%X The exact timing of a conversational turn conveys important information to a listener. Most turns are initiated within 250ms after the previous turn. However, interlocutors take longer to initiate certain types of turns: those that either require more cognitive processing or are socially dispreferred. Many dispreferred turns are also cognitively demanding, so it is difficult to attribute specific conversational delays to social or cognitive mechanisms. In this paper, we evaluate the relative contribution of cognitive and social variables to the timing of utterances in conversation. We focus on a type of turn that is socially dispreferred, cognitively demanding, and generally delayed: other-initiations of repair (OIRs). OIRs occur when a listener notices and decides to signal a comprehension problem (e.g., “What?”). We analyzed the Floor Transfer Offsets of 456 OIRs, and found that interlocutors initiated OIRs later when trouble sources had weaker discourse context or were shorter, and when the OIR was more face-threatening. Our results suggest that both cognitive and social variables contribute to the timing of delayed utterances in conversation. We discuss how attention, prediction, planning, and social preference manifest in the timing of turns.
%R 10.5210/dad.2021.102
%U https://aclanthology.org/2021.dnd-12.9/
%U https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2021.102
%P 21-44
Markdown (Informal)
[Cognitive and social delays in the initiation of conversational repair](https://aclanthology.org/2021.dnd-12.9/) (Mertens & Ruiter, DND 2021)
ACL