GHOST at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Is explanation all you need?

Kamil Pluciński, Hanna Klimczak


Abstract
This paper discusses different approaches to the Toxic Spans Detection task. The problem posed by the task was to determine which words contribute mostly to recognising a document as toxic. As opposed to binary classification of entire texts, word-level assessment could be of great use during comment moderation, also allowing for a more in-depth comprehension of the model’s predictions. As the main goal was to ensure transparency and understanding, this paper focuses on the current state-of-the-art approaches based on the explainable AI concepts and compares them to a supervised learning solution with word-level labels. The work consists of two xAI approaches that automatically provide the explanation for models trained for binary classification of toxic documents: an LSTM model with attention as a model-specific approach and the Shapley values for interpreting BERT predictions as a model-agnostic method. The competing approach considers this problem as supervised token classification, where models like BERT and its modifications were tested. The paper aims to explore, compare and assess the quality of predictions for different methods on the task. The advantages of each approach and further research direction are also discussed.
Anthology ID:
2021.semeval-1.114
Volume:
Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2021)
Month:
August
Year:
2021
Address:
Online
Venues:
ACL | IJCNLP | SemEval
SIG:
SIGLEX
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
852–859
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2021.semeval-1.114
DOI:
10.18653/v1/2021.semeval-1.114
Bibkey:
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2021.semeval-1.114.pdf