<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="gari-soler-etal-2022-one">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>One Word, Two Sides: Traces of Stance in Contextualized Word Representations</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Aina</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Garí Soler</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Matthieu</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Labeau</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Chloé</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Clavel</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2022-10</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>International Committee on Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Gyeongju, Republic of Korea</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>The way we use words is influenced by our opinion. We investigate whether this is reflected in contextualized word embeddings. For example, is the representation of “animal” different between people who would abolish zoos and those who would not? We explore this question from a Lexical Semantic Change standpoint. Our experiments with BERT embeddings derived from datasets with stance annotations reveal small but significant differences in word representations between opposing stances.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">gari-soler-etal-2022-one</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.347</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2022-10</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>3950</start>
            <end>3959</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T One Word, Two Sides: Traces of Stance in Contextualized Word Representations
%A Garí Soler, Aina
%A Labeau, Matthieu
%A Clavel, Chloé
%S Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics
%D 2022
%8 October
%I International Committee on Computational Linguistics
%C Gyeongju, Republic of Korea
%F gari-soler-etal-2022-one
%X The way we use words is influenced by our opinion. We investigate whether this is reflected in contextualized word embeddings. For example, is the representation of “animal” different between people who would abolish zoos and those who would not? We explore this question from a Lexical Semantic Change standpoint. Our experiments with BERT embeddings derived from datasets with stance annotations reveal small but significant differences in word representations between opposing stances.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.347
%P 3950-3959

Markdown (Informal)

[One Word, Two Sides: Traces of Stance in Contextualized Word Representations](https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.347) (Garí Soler et al., COLING 2022)

• One Word, Two Sides: Traces of Stance in Contextualized Word Representations (Garí Soler et al., COLING 2022)

ACL

• Aina Garí Soler, Matthieu Labeau, and Chloé Clavel. 2022. One Word, Two Sides: Traces of Stance in Contextualized Word Representations. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 3950–3959, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.