@inproceedings{benotti-blackburn-2022-ethics,
title = "Ethics consideration sections in natural language processing papers",
author = "Benotti, Luciana and
Blackburn, Patrick",
editor = "Goldberg, Yoav and
Kozareva, Zornitsa and
Zhang, Yue",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
month = dec,
year = "2022",
address = "Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.299",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.299",
pages = "4509--4516",
abstract = "In this paper, we present the results of a manual classification of all ethical consideration sections for ACL 2021. We also compare how many papers had an ethics consideration section per track and per world region in ACL 2021. We classified papers according to the ethical issues covered (research benefits, potential harms, and vulnerable groups affected) and whether the paper was marked as requiring ethics review by at least one reviewer. Moreover, we discuss recurring obstacles we have observed (highlighting some interesting texts we found along the way) and conclude with three suggestions. We think that this paper may be useful for anyone who needs to write {---} or review {---} an ethics section and would like to get an overview of what others have done.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="benotti-blackburn-2022-ethics">
<titleInfo>
<title>Ethics consideration sections in natural language processing papers</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Luciana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Benotti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Patrick</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blackburn</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2022-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yoav</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Goldberg</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Zornitsa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kozareva</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>In this paper, we present the results of a manual classification of all ethical consideration sections for ACL 2021. We also compare how many papers had an ethics consideration section per track and per world region in ACL 2021. We classified papers according to the ethical issues covered (research benefits, potential harms, and vulnerable groups affected) and whether the paper was marked as requiring ethics review by at least one reviewer. Moreover, we discuss recurring obstacles we have observed (highlighting some interesting texts we found along the way) and conclude with three suggestions. We think that this paper may be useful for anyone who needs to write — or review — an ethics section and would like to get an overview of what others have done.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">benotti-blackburn-2022-ethics</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.299</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.299</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2022-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>4509</start>
<end>4516</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Ethics consideration sections in natural language processing papers
%A Benotti, Luciana
%A Blackburn, Patrick
%Y Goldberg, Yoav
%Y Kozareva, Zornitsa
%Y Zhang, Yue
%S Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
%D 2022
%8 December
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
%F benotti-blackburn-2022-ethics
%X In this paper, we present the results of a manual classification of all ethical consideration sections for ACL 2021. We also compare how many papers had an ethics consideration section per track and per world region in ACL 2021. We classified papers according to the ethical issues covered (research benefits, potential harms, and vulnerable groups affected) and whether the paper was marked as requiring ethics review by at least one reviewer. Moreover, we discuss recurring obstacles we have observed (highlighting some interesting texts we found along the way) and conclude with three suggestions. We think that this paper may be useful for anyone who needs to write — or review — an ethics section and would like to get an overview of what others have done.
%R 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.299
%U https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.299
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.299
%P 4509-4516
Markdown (Informal)
[Ethics consideration sections in natural language processing papers](https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.299) (Benotti & Blackburn, EMNLP 2022)
ACL