%0 Conference Proceedings %T Evaluating the Impact of Model Scale for Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing %A Qiu, Linlu %A Shaw, Peter %A Pasupat, Panupong %A Shi, Tianze %A Herzig, Jonathan %A Pitler, Emily %A Sha, Fei %A Toutanova, Kristina %Y Goldberg, Yoav %Y Kozareva, Zornitsa %Y Zhang, Yue %S Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing %D 2022 %8 December %I Association for Computational Linguistics %C Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates %F qiu-etal-2022-evaluating %X Despite their strong performance on many tasks, pre-trained language models have been shown to struggle on out-of-distribution compositional generalization. Meanwhile, recent work has shown considerable improvements on many NLP tasks from model scaling. Can scaling up model size also improve compositional generalization in semantic parsing? We evaluate encoder-decoder models up to 11B parameters and decoder-only models up to 540B parameters, and compare model scaling curves for three different methods for applying a pre-trained language model to a new task: fine-tuning all parameters, prompt tuning, and in-context learning. We observe that fine-tuning generally has flat or negative scaling curves on out-of-distribution compositional generalization in semantic parsing evaluations. In-context learning has positive scaling curves, but is generally outperformed by much smaller fine-tuned models. Prompt-tuning can outperform fine-tuning, suggesting further potential improvements from scaling as it exhibits a more positive scaling curve. Additionally, we identify several error trends that vary with model scale. For example, larger models are generally better at modeling the syntax of the output space, but are also more prone to certain types of overfitting. Overall, our study highlights limitations of current techniques for effectively leveraging model scale for compositional generalization, while our analysis also suggests promising directions for future work. %R 10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.624 %U https://aclanthology.org/2022.emnlp-main.624 %U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.624 %P 9157-9179