Language Models Understand Us, Poorly

Jared Moore


Abstract
Some claim language models understand us. Others won’t hear it. To clarify, I investigate three views of human language understanding: as-mapping, as-reliability and as-representation. I argue that while behavioral reliability is necessary for understanding, internal representations are sufficient; they climb the right hill. I review state-of-the-art language and multi-modal models: they are pragmatically challenged by under-specification of form. I question the Scaling Paradigm: limits on resources may prohibit scaled-up models from approaching understanding. Last, I describe how as-representation advances a science of understanding. We need work which probes model internals, adds more of human language, and measures what models can learn.
Anthology ID:
2022.findings-emnlp.16
Volume:
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022
Month:
December
Year:
2022
Address:
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Editors:
Yoav Goldberg, Zornitsa Kozareva, Yue Zhang
Venue:
Findings
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
214–222
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-emnlp.16
DOI:
10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.16
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Jared Moore. 2022. Language Models Understand Us, Poorly. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 214–222, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Language Models Understand Us, Poorly (Moore, Findings 2022)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-emnlp.16.pdf
Video:
 https://aclanthology.org/2022.findings-emnlp.16.mp4