@inproceedings{steg-etal-2022-computational,
title = "Computational Detection of Narrativity: A Comparison Using Textual Features and Reader Response",
author = "Steg, Max and
Slot, Karlo and
Pianzola, Federico",
editor = "Degaetano, Stefania and
Kazantseva, Anna and
Reiter, Nils and
Szpakowicz, Stan",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature",
month = oct,
year = "2022",
address = "Gyeongju, Republic of Korea",
publisher = "International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.latechclfl-1.13",
pages = "105--114",
abstract = "The task of computational textual narrative detection focuses on detecting the presence of narrative parts, or the degree of narrativity in texts. In this work, we focus on detecting the local degree of narrativity in texts, using short text passages. We performed a human annotation experiment on 325 English texts ranging across 20 genres to capture readers{'} perception by means of three cognitive aspects: suspense, curiosity, and surprise. We then employed a linear regression model to predict narrativity scores for 17,372 texts. When comparing our average annotation scores to similar annotation experiments with different cognitive aspects, we found that Pearson{'}s r ranges from .63 to .75. When looking at the calculated narrative probabilities, Pearson{'}s r is .91. We found that it is possible to use suspense, curiosity and surprise to detect narrativity. However, there are still differences between methods. This does not imply that there are inherently correct methods, but rather suggests that the underlying definition of narrativity is a determining factor for the results of the computational models employed.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="steg-etal-2022-computational">
<titleInfo>
<title>Computational Detection of Narrativity: A Comparison Using Textual Features and Reader Response</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Max</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Steg</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Karlo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Slot</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Federico</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pianzola</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2022-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefania</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Degaetano</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Anna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kazantseva</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nils</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Reiter</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Szpakowicz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>International Conference on Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Gyeongju, Republic of Korea</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The task of computational textual narrative detection focuses on detecting the presence of narrative parts, or the degree of narrativity in texts. In this work, we focus on detecting the local degree of narrativity in texts, using short text passages. We performed a human annotation experiment on 325 English texts ranging across 20 genres to capture readers’ perception by means of three cognitive aspects: suspense, curiosity, and surprise. We then employed a linear regression model to predict narrativity scores for 17,372 texts. When comparing our average annotation scores to similar annotation experiments with different cognitive aspects, we found that Pearson’s r ranges from .63 to .75. When looking at the calculated narrative probabilities, Pearson’s r is .91. We found that it is possible to use suspense, curiosity and surprise to detect narrativity. However, there are still differences between methods. This does not imply that there are inherently correct methods, but rather suggests that the underlying definition of narrativity is a determining factor for the results of the computational models employed.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">steg-etal-2022-computational</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2022.latechclfl-1.13</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2022-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>105</start>
<end>114</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Computational Detection of Narrativity: A Comparison Using Textual Features and Reader Response
%A Steg, Max
%A Slot, Karlo
%A Pianzola, Federico
%Y Degaetano, Stefania
%Y Kazantseva, Anna
%Y Reiter, Nils
%Y Szpakowicz, Stan
%S Proceedings of the 6th Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature
%D 2022
%8 October
%I International Conference on Computational Linguistics
%C Gyeongju, Republic of Korea
%F steg-etal-2022-computational
%X The task of computational textual narrative detection focuses on detecting the presence of narrative parts, or the degree of narrativity in texts. In this work, we focus on detecting the local degree of narrativity in texts, using short text passages. We performed a human annotation experiment on 325 English texts ranging across 20 genres to capture readers’ perception by means of three cognitive aspects: suspense, curiosity, and surprise. We then employed a linear regression model to predict narrativity scores for 17,372 texts. When comparing our average annotation scores to similar annotation experiments with different cognitive aspects, we found that Pearson’s r ranges from .63 to .75. When looking at the calculated narrative probabilities, Pearson’s r is .91. We found that it is possible to use suspense, curiosity and surprise to detect narrativity. However, there are still differences between methods. This does not imply that there are inherently correct methods, but rather suggests that the underlying definition of narrativity is a determining factor for the results of the computational models employed.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2022.latechclfl-1.13
%P 105-114
Markdown (Informal)
[Computational Detection of Narrativity: A Comparison Using Textual Features and Reader Response](https://aclanthology.org/2022.latechclfl-1.13) (Steg et al., LaTeCHCLfL 2022)
ACL