@inproceedings{klamm-etal-2022-frameast,
title = "{F}rame{AS}t: A Framework for Second-level Agenda Setting in Parliamentary Debates through the Lense of Comparative Agenda Topics",
author = "Klamm, Christopher and
Rehbein, Ines and
Ponzetto, Simone Paolo",
editor = "Fi{\v{s}}er, Darja and
Eskevich, Maria and
Lenardi{\v{c}}, Jakob and
de Jong, Franciska",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop ParlaCLARIN III within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
month = jun,
year = "2022",
address = "Marseille, France",
publisher = "European Language Resources Association",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.parlaclarin-1.13",
pages = "92--100",
abstract = "This paper presents a framework for studying second-level political agenda setting in parliamentary debates, based on the selection of policy topics used by political actors to discuss a specific issue on the parliamentary agenda. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic as an agenda item can be contextualised as a health issue or as a civil rights issue, as a matter of macroeconomics or can be discussed in the context of social welfare. Our framework allows us to observe differences regarding how different parties discuss the same agenda item by emphasizing different topical aspects of the item. We apply and evaluate our framework on data from the German Bundestag and discuss the merits and limitations of our approach. In addition, we present a new annotated data set of parliamentary debates, following the coding schema of policy topics developed in the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP), and release models for topic classification in parliamentary debates.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="klamm-etal-2022-frameast">
<titleInfo>
<title>FrameASt: A Framework for Second-level Agenda Setting in Parliamentary Debates through the Lense of Comparative Agenda Topics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christopher</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Klamm</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ines</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rehbein</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Simone</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Paolo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ponzetto</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2022-06</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Workshop ParlaCLARIN III within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Darja</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Fišer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maria</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Eskevich</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jakob</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lenardič</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Franciska</namePart>
<namePart type="family">de Jong</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>European Language Resources Association</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Marseille, France</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>This paper presents a framework for studying second-level political agenda setting in parliamentary debates, based on the selection of policy topics used by political actors to discuss a specific issue on the parliamentary agenda. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic as an agenda item can be contextualised as a health issue or as a civil rights issue, as a matter of macroeconomics or can be discussed in the context of social welfare. Our framework allows us to observe differences regarding how different parties discuss the same agenda item by emphasizing different topical aspects of the item. We apply and evaluate our framework on data from the German Bundestag and discuss the merits and limitations of our approach. In addition, we present a new annotated data set of parliamentary debates, following the coding schema of policy topics developed in the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP), and release models for topic classification in parliamentary debates.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">klamm-etal-2022-frameast</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2022.parlaclarin-1.13</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2022-06</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>92</start>
<end>100</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T FrameASt: A Framework for Second-level Agenda Setting in Parliamentary Debates through the Lense of Comparative Agenda Topics
%A Klamm, Christopher
%A Rehbein, Ines
%A Ponzetto, Simone Paolo
%Y Fišer, Darja
%Y Eskevich, Maria
%Y Lenardič, Jakob
%Y de Jong, Franciska
%S Proceedings of the Workshop ParlaCLARIN III within the 13th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference
%D 2022
%8 June
%I European Language Resources Association
%C Marseille, France
%F klamm-etal-2022-frameast
%X This paper presents a framework for studying second-level political agenda setting in parliamentary debates, based on the selection of policy topics used by political actors to discuss a specific issue on the parliamentary agenda. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic as an agenda item can be contextualised as a health issue or as a civil rights issue, as a matter of macroeconomics or can be discussed in the context of social welfare. Our framework allows us to observe differences regarding how different parties discuss the same agenda item by emphasizing different topical aspects of the item. We apply and evaluate our framework on data from the German Bundestag and discuss the merits and limitations of our approach. In addition, we present a new annotated data set of parliamentary debates, following the coding schema of policy topics developed in the Comparative Agendas Project (CAP), and release models for topic classification in parliamentary debates.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2022.parlaclarin-1.13
%P 92-100
Markdown (Informal)
[FrameASt: A Framework for Second-level Agenda Setting in Parliamentary Debates through the Lense of Comparative Agenda Topics](https://aclanthology.org/2022.parlaclarin-1.13) (Klamm et al., ParlaCLARIN 2022)
ACL