@inproceedings{das-etal-2022-one,
title = "Which One Is More Toxic? Findings from Jigsaw Rate Severity of Toxic Comments",
author = "Das, Millon and
Saha, Punyajoy and
Das, Mithun",
editor = "Kumar, Ritesh and
Ojha, Atul Kr. and
Zampieri, Marcos and
Malmasi, Shervin and
Kadar, Daniel",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Threat, Aggression and Cyberbullying (TRAC 2022)",
month = oct,
year = "2022",
address = "Gyeongju, Republic of Korea",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2022.trac-1.2",
pages = "10--15",
abstract = "The proliferation of online hate speech has necessitated the creation of algorithms which can detect toxicity. Most of the past research focuses on this detection as a classification task, but assigning an absolute toxicity label is often tricky. Hence, few of the past works transform the same task into a regression. This paper shows the comparative evaluation of different transformers and traditional machine learning models on a recently released toxicity severity measurement dataset by Jigsaw. We further demonstrate the issues with the model predictions using explainability analysis.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="das-etal-2022-one">
<titleInfo>
<title>Which One Is More Toxic? Findings from Jigsaw Rate Severity of Toxic Comments</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Millon</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Das</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Punyajoy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Saha</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Mithun</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Das</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2022-10</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Threat, Aggression and Cyberbullying (TRAC 2022)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ritesh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kumar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Atul</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kr.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ojha</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Marcos</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zampieri</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shervin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Malmasi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kadar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Gyeongju, Republic of Korea</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The proliferation of online hate speech has necessitated the creation of algorithms which can detect toxicity. Most of the past research focuses on this detection as a classification task, but assigning an absolute toxicity label is often tricky. Hence, few of the past works transform the same task into a regression. This paper shows the comparative evaluation of different transformers and traditional machine learning models on a recently released toxicity severity measurement dataset by Jigsaw. We further demonstrate the issues with the model predictions using explainability analysis.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">das-etal-2022-one</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2022.trac-1.2</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2022-10</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>10</start>
<end>15</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Which One Is More Toxic? Findings from Jigsaw Rate Severity of Toxic Comments
%A Das, Millon
%A Saha, Punyajoy
%A Das, Mithun
%Y Kumar, Ritesh
%Y Ojha, Atul Kr.
%Y Zampieri, Marcos
%Y Malmasi, Shervin
%Y Kadar, Daniel
%S Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Threat, Aggression and Cyberbullying (TRAC 2022)
%D 2022
%8 October
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Gyeongju, Republic of Korea
%F das-etal-2022-one
%X The proliferation of online hate speech has necessitated the creation of algorithms which can detect toxicity. Most of the past research focuses on this detection as a classification task, but assigning an absolute toxicity label is often tricky. Hence, few of the past works transform the same task into a regression. This paper shows the comparative evaluation of different transformers and traditional machine learning models on a recently released toxicity severity measurement dataset by Jigsaw. We further demonstrate the issues with the model predictions using explainability analysis.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2022.trac-1.2
%P 10-15
Markdown (Informal)
[Which One Is More Toxic? Findings from Jigsaw Rate Severity of Toxic Comments](https://aclanthology.org/2022.trac-1.2) (Das et al., TRAC 2022)
ACL