@inproceedings{kletz-etal-2023-self,
title = "The Self-Contained Negation Test Set",
author = "Kletz, David and
Amsili, Pascal and
Candito, Marie",
editor = "Belinkov, Yonatan and
Hao, Sophie and
Jumelet, Jaap and
Kim, Najoung and
McCarthy, Arya and
Mohebbi, Hosein",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP",
month = dec,
year = "2023",
address = "Singapore",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16",
pages = "212--221",
abstract = "Several methodologies have recently been proposed to evaluate the ability of Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) to interpret negation. In this article, we build on Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022), which studies the modification of PLMs{'} predictions as a function of the polarity of inputs, in English. Crucially, this test uses {``}self-contained{''} inputs ending with a masked position: depending on the polarity of a verb in the input, a particular token is either semantically ruled out or allowed at the masked position. By replicating Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022) experiments, we have uncovered flaws that weaken the conclusions that can be drawn from this test. We thus propose an improved version, the Self-Contained Neg Test, which is more controlled, more systematic, and entirely based on examples forming minimal pairs varying only in the presence or absence of verbal negation in English. When applying our test to the roberta and bert base and large models, we show that only roberta-large shows trends that match the expectations, while bert-base is mostly insensitive to negation. For all the tested models though, in a significant number of test instances the top-1 prediction remains the token that is semantically forbidden by the context, which shows how much room for improvement remains for a proper treatment of the negation phenomenon.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="kletz-etal-2023-self">
<titleInfo>
<title>The Self-Contained Negation Test Set</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kletz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pascal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Amsili</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Marie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Candito</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2023-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yonatan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Belinkov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sophie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hao</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jaap</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jumelet</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Najoung</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kim</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Arya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McCarthy</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hosein</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mohebbi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Singapore</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Several methodologies have recently been proposed to evaluate the ability of Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) to interpret negation. In this article, we build on Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022), which studies the modification of PLMs’ predictions as a function of the polarity of inputs, in English. Crucially, this test uses “self-contained” inputs ending with a masked position: depending on the polarity of a verb in the input, a particular token is either semantically ruled out or allowed at the masked position. By replicating Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022) experiments, we have uncovered flaws that weaken the conclusions that can be drawn from this test. We thus propose an improved version, the Self-Contained Neg Test, which is more controlled, more systematic, and entirely based on examples forming minimal pairs varying only in the presence or absence of verbal negation in English. When applying our test to the roberta and bert base and large models, we show that only roberta-large shows trends that match the expectations, while bert-base is mostly insensitive to negation. For all the tested models though, in a significant number of test instances the top-1 prediction remains the token that is semantically forbidden by the context, which shows how much room for improvement remains for a proper treatment of the negation phenomenon.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">kletz-etal-2023-self</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2023-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>212</start>
<end>221</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T The Self-Contained Negation Test Set
%A Kletz, David
%A Amsili, Pascal
%A Candito, Marie
%Y Belinkov, Yonatan
%Y Hao, Sophie
%Y Jumelet, Jaap
%Y Kim, Najoung
%Y McCarthy, Arya
%Y Mohebbi, Hosein
%S Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
%D 2023
%8 December
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Singapore
%F kletz-etal-2023-self
%X Several methodologies have recently been proposed to evaluate the ability of Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) to interpret negation. In this article, we build on Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022), which studies the modification of PLMs’ predictions as a function of the polarity of inputs, in English. Crucially, this test uses “self-contained” inputs ending with a masked position: depending on the polarity of a verb in the input, a particular token is either semantically ruled out or allowed at the masked position. By replicating Gubelmann and Handschuh (2022) experiments, we have uncovered flaws that weaken the conclusions that can be drawn from this test. We thus propose an improved version, the Self-Contained Neg Test, which is more controlled, more systematic, and entirely based on examples forming minimal pairs varying only in the presence or absence of verbal negation in English. When applying our test to the roberta and bert base and large models, we show that only roberta-large shows trends that match the expectations, while bert-base is mostly insensitive to negation. For all the tested models though, in a significant number of test instances the top-1 prediction remains the token that is semantically forbidden by the context, which shows how much room for improvement remains for a proper treatment of the negation phenomenon.
%R 10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16
%U https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16
%P 212-221
Markdown (Informal)
[The Self-Contained Negation Test Set](https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.16) (Kletz et al., BlackboxNLP-WS 2023)
ACL
- David Kletz, Pascal Amsili, and Marie Candito. 2023. The Self-Contained Negation Test Set. In Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, pages 212–221, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.