@inproceedings{gupta-2023-probing,
title = "Probing Quantifier Comprehension in Large Language Models: Another Example of Inverse Scaling",
author = "Gupta, Akshat",
editor = "Belinkov, Yonatan and
Hao, Sophie and
Jumelet, Jaap and
Kim, Najoung and
McCarthy, Arya and
Mohebbi, Hosein",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP",
month = dec,
year = "2023",
address = "Singapore",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4",
pages = "56--64",
abstract = "With their increasing size, large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly good at language understanding tasks. But even with high performance on specific downstream task, LLMs fail at simple linguistic tests for negation or quantifier understanding. Previous work on quantifier understanding in LLMs show inverse scaling in understanding few-type quantifiers. In this paper, we question the claims of of previous work and show that it is a result of inappropriate testing methodology. We also present alternate methods to measure quantifier comprehension in LLMs and show that LLMs are able to better understand the difference between the meaning of few-type and most-type quantifiers as their size increases, although they are not particularly good at it. We also observe inverse scaling for most-type quantifier understanding, which is contrary to human psycho-linguistic experiments and previous work, where the model{'}s understanding of most-type quantifier gets worse as the model size increases. We do this evaluation on models ranging from 125M-175B parameters, which suggests that LLMs do not do as well as expected with quantifiers. We also discuss the possible reasons for this and the relevance of quantifier understanding in evaluating language understanding in LLMs.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="gupta-2023-probing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Probing Quantifier Comprehension in Large Language Models: Another Example of Inverse Scaling</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Akshat</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gupta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2023-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yonatan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Belinkov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sophie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hao</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jaap</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jumelet</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Najoung</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kim</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Arya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McCarthy</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hosein</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mohebbi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Singapore</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>With their increasing size, large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly good at language understanding tasks. But even with high performance on specific downstream task, LLMs fail at simple linguistic tests for negation or quantifier understanding. Previous work on quantifier understanding in LLMs show inverse scaling in understanding few-type quantifiers. In this paper, we question the claims of of previous work and show that it is a result of inappropriate testing methodology. We also present alternate methods to measure quantifier comprehension in LLMs and show that LLMs are able to better understand the difference between the meaning of few-type and most-type quantifiers as their size increases, although they are not particularly good at it. We also observe inverse scaling for most-type quantifier understanding, which is contrary to human psycho-linguistic experiments and previous work, where the model’s understanding of most-type quantifier gets worse as the model size increases. We do this evaluation on models ranging from 125M-175B parameters, which suggests that LLMs do not do as well as expected with quantifiers. We also discuss the possible reasons for this and the relevance of quantifier understanding in evaluating language understanding in LLMs.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">gupta-2023-probing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2023-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>56</start>
<end>64</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Probing Quantifier Comprehension in Large Language Models: Another Example of Inverse Scaling
%A Gupta, Akshat
%Y Belinkov, Yonatan
%Y Hao, Sophie
%Y Jumelet, Jaap
%Y Kim, Najoung
%Y McCarthy, Arya
%Y Mohebbi, Hosein
%S Proceedings of the 6th BlackboxNLP Workshop: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP
%D 2023
%8 December
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Singapore
%F gupta-2023-probing
%X With their increasing size, large language models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly good at language understanding tasks. But even with high performance on specific downstream task, LLMs fail at simple linguistic tests for negation or quantifier understanding. Previous work on quantifier understanding in LLMs show inverse scaling in understanding few-type quantifiers. In this paper, we question the claims of of previous work and show that it is a result of inappropriate testing methodology. We also present alternate methods to measure quantifier comprehension in LLMs and show that LLMs are able to better understand the difference between the meaning of few-type and most-type quantifiers as their size increases, although they are not particularly good at it. We also observe inverse scaling for most-type quantifier understanding, which is contrary to human psycho-linguistic experiments and previous work, where the model’s understanding of most-type quantifier gets worse as the model size increases. We do this evaluation on models ranging from 125M-175B parameters, which suggests that LLMs do not do as well as expected with quantifiers. We also discuss the possible reasons for this and the relevance of quantifier understanding in evaluating language understanding in LLMs.
%R 10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4
%U https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4
%P 56-64
Markdown (Informal)
[Probing Quantifier Comprehension in Large Language Models: Another Example of Inverse Scaling](https://aclanthology.org/2023.blackboxnlp-1.4) (Gupta, BlackboxNLP-WS 2023)
ACL