@inproceedings{holzenberger-van-durme-2023-connecting,
title = "Connecting Symbolic Statutory Reasoning with Legal Information Extraction",
author = "Holzenberger, Nils and
Van Durme, Benjamin",
editor = "Preoțiuc-Pietro, Daniel and
Goanta, Catalina and
Chalkidis, Ilias and
Barrett, Leslie and
Spanakis, Gerasimos and
Aletras, Nikolaos",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2023",
month = dec,
year = "2023",
address = "Singapore",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.nllp-1.12/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.nllp-1.12",
pages = "113--131",
abstract = "Statutory reasoning is the task of determining whether a given law {--} a part of a statute {--} applies to a given legal case. Previous work has shown that structured, logical representations of laws and cases can be leveraged to solve statutory reasoning, including on the StAtutory Reasoning Assessment dataset (SARA), but rely on costly human translation into structured representations. Here, we investigate a form of legal information extraction atop the SARA cases, illustrating how the task can be done with high performance. Further, we show how the performance of downstream symbolic reasoning directly correlates with the quality of the information extraction."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="holzenberger-van-durme-2023-connecting">
<titleInfo>
<title>Connecting Symbolic Statutory Reasoning with Legal Information Extraction</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nils</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Holzenberger</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Benjamin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Van Durme</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2023-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2023</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Daniel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Preoțiuc-Pietro</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Catalina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Goanta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ilias</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chalkidis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Leslie</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Barrett</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Gerasimos</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Spanakis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nikolaos</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Aletras</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Singapore</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Statutory reasoning is the task of determining whether a given law – a part of a statute – applies to a given legal case. Previous work has shown that structured, logical representations of laws and cases can be leveraged to solve statutory reasoning, including on the StAtutory Reasoning Assessment dataset (SARA), but rely on costly human translation into structured representations. Here, we investigate a form of legal information extraction atop the SARA cases, illustrating how the task can be done with high performance. Further, we show how the performance of downstream symbolic reasoning directly correlates with the quality of the information extraction.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">holzenberger-van-durme-2023-connecting</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2023.nllp-1.12</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2023.nllp-1.12/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2023-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>113</start>
<end>131</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Connecting Symbolic Statutory Reasoning with Legal Information Extraction
%A Holzenberger, Nils
%A Van Durme, Benjamin
%Y Preoțiuc-Pietro, Daniel
%Y Goanta, Catalina
%Y Chalkidis, Ilias
%Y Barrett, Leslie
%Y Spanakis, Gerasimos
%Y Aletras, Nikolaos
%S Proceedings of the Natural Legal Language Processing Workshop 2023
%D 2023
%8 December
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Singapore
%F holzenberger-van-durme-2023-connecting
%X Statutory reasoning is the task of determining whether a given law – a part of a statute – applies to a given legal case. Previous work has shown that structured, logical representations of laws and cases can be leveraged to solve statutory reasoning, including on the StAtutory Reasoning Assessment dataset (SARA), but rely on costly human translation into structured representations. Here, we investigate a form of legal information extraction atop the SARA cases, illustrating how the task can be done with high performance. Further, we show how the performance of downstream symbolic reasoning directly correlates with the quality of the information extraction.
%R 10.18653/v1/2023.nllp-1.12
%U https://aclanthology.org/2023.nllp-1.12/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.nllp-1.12
%P 113-131
Markdown (Informal)
[Connecting Symbolic Statutory Reasoning with Legal Information Extraction](https://aclanthology.org/2023.nllp-1.12/) (Holzenberger & Van Durme, NLLP 2023)
ACL