@inproceedings{vitsakis-etal-2023-ilab,
title = "i{L}ab at {S}em{E}val-2023 Task 11 Le-Wi-Di: Modelling Disagreement or Modelling Perspectives?",
author = "Vitsakis, Nikolas and
Parekh, Amit and
Dinkar, Tanvi and
Abercrombie, Gavin and
Konstas, Ioannis and
Rieser, Verena",
editor = {Ojha, Atul Kr. and
Do{\u{g}}ru{\"o}z, A. Seza and
Da San Martino, Giovanni and
Tayyar Madabushi, Harish and
Kumar, Ritesh and
Sartori, Elisa},
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2023)",
month = jul,
year = "2023",
address = "Toronto, Canada",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.semeval-1.231",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.231",
pages = "1660--1669",
abstract = "There are two competing approaches for modelling annotator disagreement: distributional soft-labelling approaches (which aim to capture the level of disagreement) or modelling perspectives of individual annotators or groups thereof. We adapt a multi-task architecture which has previously shown success in modelling perspectives to evaluate its performance on the SEMEVAL Task 11. We do so by combining both approaches, i.e. predicting individual annotator perspectives as an interim step towards predicting annotator disagreement. Despite its previous success, we found that a multi-task approach performed poorly on datasets which contained distinct annotator opinions, suggesting that this approach may not always be suitable when modelling perspectives. Furthermore, our results explain that while strongly perspectivist approaches might not achieve state-of-the-art performance according to evaluation metrics used by distributional approaches, our approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of individual perspectives present in the data. We argue that perspectivist approaches are preferable because they enable decision makers to amplify minority views, and that it is important to re-evaluate metrics to reflect this goal.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="vitsakis-etal-2023-ilab">
<titleInfo>
<title>iLab at SemEval-2023 Task 11 Le-Wi-Di: Modelling Disagreement or Modelling Perspectives?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nikolas</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Vitsakis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Amit</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Parekh</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tanvi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dinkar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Gavin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Abercrombie</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ioannis</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Konstas</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Verena</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rieser</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2023-07</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2023)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Atul</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kr.</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ojha</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Seza</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Doğruöz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Giovanni</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Da San Martino</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Harish</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tayyar Madabushi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ritesh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kumar</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Elisa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sartori</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Toronto, Canada</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>There are two competing approaches for modelling annotator disagreement: distributional soft-labelling approaches (which aim to capture the level of disagreement) or modelling perspectives of individual annotators or groups thereof. We adapt a multi-task architecture which has previously shown success in modelling perspectives to evaluate its performance on the SEMEVAL Task 11. We do so by combining both approaches, i.e. predicting individual annotator perspectives as an interim step towards predicting annotator disagreement. Despite its previous success, we found that a multi-task approach performed poorly on datasets which contained distinct annotator opinions, suggesting that this approach may not always be suitable when modelling perspectives. Furthermore, our results explain that while strongly perspectivist approaches might not achieve state-of-the-art performance according to evaluation metrics used by distributional approaches, our approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of individual perspectives present in the data. We argue that perspectivist approaches are preferable because they enable decision makers to amplify minority views, and that it is important to re-evaluate metrics to reflect this goal.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">vitsakis-etal-2023-ilab</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.231</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2023.semeval-1.231</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2023-07</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1660</start>
<end>1669</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T iLab at SemEval-2023 Task 11 Le-Wi-Di: Modelling Disagreement or Modelling Perspectives?
%A Vitsakis, Nikolas
%A Parekh, Amit
%A Dinkar, Tanvi
%A Abercrombie, Gavin
%A Konstas, Ioannis
%A Rieser, Verena
%Y Ojha, Atul Kr.
%Y Doğruöz, A. Seza
%Y Da San Martino, Giovanni
%Y Tayyar Madabushi, Harish
%Y Kumar, Ritesh
%Y Sartori, Elisa
%S Proceedings of the 17th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2023)
%D 2023
%8 July
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Toronto, Canada
%F vitsakis-etal-2023-ilab
%X There are two competing approaches for modelling annotator disagreement: distributional soft-labelling approaches (which aim to capture the level of disagreement) or modelling perspectives of individual annotators or groups thereof. We adapt a multi-task architecture which has previously shown success in modelling perspectives to evaluate its performance on the SEMEVAL Task 11. We do so by combining both approaches, i.e. predicting individual annotator perspectives as an interim step towards predicting annotator disagreement. Despite its previous success, we found that a multi-task approach performed poorly on datasets which contained distinct annotator opinions, suggesting that this approach may not always be suitable when modelling perspectives. Furthermore, our results explain that while strongly perspectivist approaches might not achieve state-of-the-art performance according to evaluation metrics used by distributional approaches, our approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of individual perspectives present in the data. We argue that perspectivist approaches are preferable because they enable decision makers to amplify minority views, and that it is important to re-evaluate metrics to reflect this goal.
%R 10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.231
%U https://aclanthology.org/2023.semeval-1.231
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.231
%P 1660-1669
Markdown (Informal)
[iLab at SemEval-2023 Task 11 Le-Wi-Di: Modelling Disagreement or Modelling Perspectives?](https://aclanthology.org/2023.semeval-1.231) (Vitsakis et al., SemEval 2023)
ACL