@inproceedings{komatani-etal-2023-analyzing,
title = "Analyzing Differences in Subjective Annotations by Participants and Third-party Annotators in Multimodal Dialogue Corpus",
author = "Komatani, Kazunori and
Takeda, Ryu and
Okada, Shogo",
editor = "Stoyanchev, Svetlana and
Joty, Shafiq and
Schlangen, David and
Dusek, Ondrej and
Kennington, Casey and
Alikhani, Malihe",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue",
month = sep,
year = "2023",
address = "Prague, Czechia",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.sigdial-1.9",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.9",
pages = "104--113",
abstract = "Estimating the subjective impressions of human users during a dialogue is necessary when constructing a dialogue system that can respond adaptively to their emotional states. However, such subjective impressions (e.g., how much the user enjoys the dialogue) are inherently ambiguous, and the annotation results provided by multiple annotators do not always agree because they depend on the subjectivity of the annotators. In this paper, we analyzed the annotation results using 13,226 exchanges from 155 participants in a multimodal dialogue corpus called Hazumi that we had constructed, where each exchange was annotated by five third-party annotators. We investigated the agreement between the subjective annotations given by the third-party annotators and the participants themselves, on both per-exchange annotations (i.e., participant{'}s sentiments) and per-dialogue (-participant) annotations (i.e., questionnaires on rapport and personality traits). We also investigated the conditions under which the annotation results are reliable. Our findings demonstrate that the dispersion of third-party sentiment annotations correlates with agreeableness of the participants, one of the Big Five personality traits.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="komatani-etal-2023-analyzing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Analyzing Differences in Subjective Annotations by Participants and Third-party Annotators in Multimodal Dialogue Corpus</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kazunori</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Komatani</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ryu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Takeda</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shogo</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Okada</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2023-09</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Svetlana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stoyanchev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shafiq</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Joty</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schlangen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ondrej</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dusek</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Casey</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kennington</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Malihe</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Alikhani</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Prague, Czechia</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Estimating the subjective impressions of human users during a dialogue is necessary when constructing a dialogue system that can respond adaptively to their emotional states. However, such subjective impressions (e.g., how much the user enjoys the dialogue) are inherently ambiguous, and the annotation results provided by multiple annotators do not always agree because they depend on the subjectivity of the annotators. In this paper, we analyzed the annotation results using 13,226 exchanges from 155 participants in a multimodal dialogue corpus called Hazumi that we had constructed, where each exchange was annotated by five third-party annotators. We investigated the agreement between the subjective annotations given by the third-party annotators and the participants themselves, on both per-exchange annotations (i.e., participant’s sentiments) and per-dialogue (-participant) annotations (i.e., questionnaires on rapport and personality traits). We also investigated the conditions under which the annotation results are reliable. Our findings demonstrate that the dispersion of third-party sentiment annotations correlates with agreeableness of the participants, one of the Big Five personality traits.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">komatani-etal-2023-analyzing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.9</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2023.sigdial-1.9</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2023-09</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>104</start>
<end>113</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Analyzing Differences in Subjective Annotations by Participants and Third-party Annotators in Multimodal Dialogue Corpus
%A Komatani, Kazunori
%A Takeda, Ryu
%A Okada, Shogo
%Y Stoyanchev, Svetlana
%Y Joty, Shafiq
%Y Schlangen, David
%Y Dusek, Ondrej
%Y Kennington, Casey
%Y Alikhani, Malihe
%S Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
%D 2023
%8 September
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Prague, Czechia
%F komatani-etal-2023-analyzing
%X Estimating the subjective impressions of human users during a dialogue is necessary when constructing a dialogue system that can respond adaptively to their emotional states. However, such subjective impressions (e.g., how much the user enjoys the dialogue) are inherently ambiguous, and the annotation results provided by multiple annotators do not always agree because they depend on the subjectivity of the annotators. In this paper, we analyzed the annotation results using 13,226 exchanges from 155 participants in a multimodal dialogue corpus called Hazumi that we had constructed, where each exchange was annotated by five third-party annotators. We investigated the agreement between the subjective annotations given by the third-party annotators and the participants themselves, on both per-exchange annotations (i.e., participant’s sentiments) and per-dialogue (-participant) annotations (i.e., questionnaires on rapport and personality traits). We also investigated the conditions under which the annotation results are reliable. Our findings demonstrate that the dispersion of third-party sentiment annotations correlates with agreeableness of the participants, one of the Big Five personality traits.
%R 10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.9
%U https://aclanthology.org/2023.sigdial-1.9
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.9
%P 104-113
Markdown (Informal)
[Analyzing Differences in Subjective Annotations by Participants and Third-party Annotators in Multimodal Dialogue Corpus](https://aclanthology.org/2023.sigdial-1.9) (Komatani et al., SIGDIAL 2023)
ACL