<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="chen-etal-2024-exploring-potential">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Guizhen</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Chen</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Liying</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Cheng</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Anh</namePart>
        <namePart type="given">Tuan</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Luu</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Lidong</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Bing</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2024-08</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Lun-Wei</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Ku</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Andre</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Martins</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Vivek</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Srikumar</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Bangkok, Thailand</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Computational argumentation has become an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. It is an emerging research field in natural language processing that attracts increasing attention. Research on computational argumentation mainly involves two types of tasks: argument mining and argument generation. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language, it is worthwhile to evaluate the performance of LLMs on diverse computational argumentation tasks. This work aims to embark on an assessment of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, Flan models, and LLaMA2 models, in both zero-shot and few-shot settings. We organize existing tasks into six main categories and standardize the format of fourteen openly available datasets. In addition, we present a new benchmark dataset on counter speech generation that aims to holistically evaluate the end-to-end performance of LLMs on argument mining and argument generation. Extensive experiments show that LLMs exhibit commendable performance across most of the datasets, demonstrating their capabilities in the field of argumentation. Our analysis offers valuable suggestions for evaluating computational argumentation and its integration with LLMs in future research endeavors.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">chen-etal-2024-exploring-potential</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.126</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.126</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2024-08</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>2309</start>
            <end>2330</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation
%A Chen, Guizhen
%A Cheng, Liying
%A Luu, Anh Tuan
%A Bing, Lidong
%Y Ku, Lun-Wei
%Y Martins, Andre
%Y Srikumar, Vivek
%S Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
%D 2024
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Bangkok, Thailand
%F chen-etal-2024-exploring-potential
%X Computational argumentation has become an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. It is an emerging research field in natural language processing that attracts increasing attention. Research on computational argumentation mainly involves two types of tasks: argument mining and argument generation. As large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding context and generating natural language, it is worthwhile to evaluate the performance of LLMs on diverse computational argumentation tasks. This work aims to embark on an assessment of LLMs, such as ChatGPT, Flan models, and LLaMA2 models, in both zero-shot and few-shot settings. We organize existing tasks into six main categories and standardize the format of fourteen openly available datasets. In addition, we present a new benchmark dataset on counter speech generation that aims to holistically evaluate the end-to-end performance of LLMs on argument mining and argument generation. Extensive experiments show that LLMs exhibit commendable performance across most of the datasets, demonstrating their capabilities in the field of argumentation. Our analysis offers valuable suggestions for evaluating computational argumentation and its integration with LLMs in future research endeavors.
%R 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.126
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.126
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.126
%P 2309-2330

Markdown (Informal)

[Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation](https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.126) (Chen et al., ACL 2024)

• Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation (Chen et al., ACL 2024)

ACL

• Guizhen Chen, Liying Cheng, Anh Tuan Luu, and Lidong Bing. 2024. Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2309–2330, Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics.