@inproceedings{lanz-pecina-2024-paragraph,
title = "Paragraph Retrieval for Enhanced Question Answering in Clinical Documents",
author = "Lanz, Vojtech and
Pecina, Pavel",
editor = "Demner-Fushman, Dina and
Ananiadou, Sophia and
Miwa, Makoto and
Roberts, Kirk and
Tsujii, Junichi",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.bionlp-1.48",
pages = "580--590",
abstract = "Healthcare professionals often manually extract information from large clinical documents to address patient-related questions. The use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, particularly Question Answering (QA) models, is a promising direction for improving the efficiency of this process. However, document-level QA from large documents is often impractical or even infeasible (for model training and inference). In this work, we solve the document-level QA from clinical reports in a two-step approach: first, the entire report is split into segments and for a given question the most relevant segment is predicted by a NLP model; second, a QA model is applied to the question and the retrieved segment as context. We investigate the effectiveness of heading-based and naive paragraph segmentation approaches for various paragraph lengths on two subsets of the emrQA dataset. Our experiments reveal that an average paragraph length used as a parameter for the segmentation has no significant effect on performance during the whole document-level QA process. That means experiments focusing on segmentation into shorter paragraphs perform similarly to those focusing on entire unsegmented reports. Surprisingly, naive uniform segmentation is sufficient even though it is not based on prior knowledge of the clinical document{'}s characteristics.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="lanz-pecina-2024-paragraph">
<titleInfo>
<title>Paragraph Retrieval for Enhanced Question Answering in Clinical Documents</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vojtech</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lanz</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pavel</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pecina</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Dina</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Demner-Fushman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sophia</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ananiadou</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Makoto</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Miwa</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kirk</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Roberts</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Junichi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tsujii</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Bangkok, Thailand</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Healthcare professionals often manually extract information from large clinical documents to address patient-related questions. The use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, particularly Question Answering (QA) models, is a promising direction for improving the efficiency of this process. However, document-level QA from large documents is often impractical or even infeasible (for model training and inference). In this work, we solve the document-level QA from clinical reports in a two-step approach: first, the entire report is split into segments and for a given question the most relevant segment is predicted by a NLP model; second, a QA model is applied to the question and the retrieved segment as context. We investigate the effectiveness of heading-based and naive paragraph segmentation approaches for various paragraph lengths on two subsets of the emrQA dataset. Our experiments reveal that an average paragraph length used as a parameter for the segmentation has no significant effect on performance during the whole document-level QA process. That means experiments focusing on segmentation into shorter paragraphs perform similarly to those focusing on entire unsegmented reports. Surprisingly, naive uniform segmentation is sufficient even though it is not based on prior knowledge of the clinical document’s characteristics.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">lanz-pecina-2024-paragraph</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.bionlp-1.48</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>580</start>
<end>590</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Paragraph Retrieval for Enhanced Question Answering in Clinical Documents
%A Lanz, Vojtech
%A Pecina, Pavel
%Y Demner-Fushman, Dina
%Y Ananiadou, Sophia
%Y Miwa, Makoto
%Y Roberts, Kirk
%Y Tsujii, Junichi
%S Proceedings of the 23rd Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing
%D 2024
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Bangkok, Thailand
%F lanz-pecina-2024-paragraph
%X Healthcare professionals often manually extract information from large clinical documents to address patient-related questions. The use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, particularly Question Answering (QA) models, is a promising direction for improving the efficiency of this process. However, document-level QA from large documents is often impractical or even infeasible (for model training and inference). In this work, we solve the document-level QA from clinical reports in a two-step approach: first, the entire report is split into segments and for a given question the most relevant segment is predicted by a NLP model; second, a QA model is applied to the question and the retrieved segment as context. We investigate the effectiveness of heading-based and naive paragraph segmentation approaches for various paragraph lengths on two subsets of the emrQA dataset. Our experiments reveal that an average paragraph length used as a parameter for the segmentation has no significant effect on performance during the whole document-level QA process. That means experiments focusing on segmentation into shorter paragraphs perform similarly to those focusing on entire unsegmented reports. Surprisingly, naive uniform segmentation is sufficient even though it is not based on prior knowledge of the clinical document’s characteristics.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.bionlp-1.48
%P 580-590
Markdown (Informal)
[Paragraph Retrieval for Enhanced Question Answering in Clinical Documents](https://aclanthology.org/2024.bionlp-1.48) (Lanz & Pecina, BioNLP-WS 2024)
ACL