@article{meuser-etal-2024-perspective,
title = "Perspective-Taking and Protagonist Prominence",
author = {Meuser, Sara and
Hinterwimmer, Stefan and
H{\"o}rl, Maximilian},
editor = "Li, Junyi Jessy and
Stede, Manfred and
Zeldes, Amir and
Ginzburg, Jonathan and
Georgila, Kallirroi and
Traum, David",
journal = "Dialogue {\&} Discourse",
volume = "15",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Chicago, Illinois, USA",
publisher = "University of Illinois Chicago",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.dnd-15.4/",
doi = "10.5210/dad.2024.201",
pages = "1--35",
abstract = "The choice of the perspectival center of a stretch of discourse is crucial for the interpretation of certain phenomena such as free indirect discourse. It has been argued that the protagonist that is most prominent compared to competing protagonists gets to be the perspectival center. In this paper we discuss grammatical function and referential expression as prominence-lending cues and their impact on perspective-taking. We take the anchoring of free indirect discourse as the indicator for a shift in perspective as free indirect discourse can only be processed correctly if the reader is able to ascribe the utterance or thought to a protagonist. Identifying the perspectival center is particularly crucial for the interpretation of a thought or utterance in free indirect discourse mode that can potentially be ascribed to different protagonists, since in contrast to direct or indirect discourse the respective speaker or thinker is not explicitly marked as such in free indirect discourse. In a series of acceptability rating studies, we tested if anchoring of free indirect discourse to the less prominent of two competing referents is perceived to be unnatural. Further, we take a closer look at the role of subject and object as well as the choice of referential expression (proper name compared to indefinite noun phrase). We find that a protagonist referred to with a proper name in subject position is highly preferred as the anchor for free indirect discourse compared to a protagonist referred to with an indefinite noun phrase in object position. Building on these findings, we present evidence that the prominence of the referent that is established in the sentence preceding a sentence in free indirect discourse mode can be overridden by discourse prominence. That is, a referent that is repeatedly mentioned in a short discourse is preferred as the perspectival center regardless of the prominence of a competing referent in the sentence preceding a sentence in free indirect discourse mode."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="meuser-etal-2024-perspective">
<titleInfo>
<title>Perspective-Taking and Protagonist Prominence</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sara</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Meuser</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hinterwimmer</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Maximilian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hörl</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Dialogue & Discourse</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>University of Illinois Chicago</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Chicago, Illinois, USA</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The choice of the perspectival center of a stretch of discourse is crucial for the interpretation of certain phenomena such as free indirect discourse. It has been argued that the protagonist that is most prominent compared to competing protagonists gets to be the perspectival center. In this paper we discuss grammatical function and referential expression as prominence-lending cues and their impact on perspective-taking. We take the anchoring of free indirect discourse as the indicator for a shift in perspective as free indirect discourse can only be processed correctly if the reader is able to ascribe the utterance or thought to a protagonist. Identifying the perspectival center is particularly crucial for the interpretation of a thought or utterance in free indirect discourse mode that can potentially be ascribed to different protagonists, since in contrast to direct or indirect discourse the respective speaker or thinker is not explicitly marked as such in free indirect discourse. In a series of acceptability rating studies, we tested if anchoring of free indirect discourse to the less prominent of two competing referents is perceived to be unnatural. Further, we take a closer look at the role of subject and object as well as the choice of referential expression (proper name compared to indefinite noun phrase). We find that a protagonist referred to with a proper name in subject position is highly preferred as the anchor for free indirect discourse compared to a protagonist referred to with an indefinite noun phrase in object position. Building on these findings, we present evidence that the prominence of the referent that is established in the sentence preceding a sentence in free indirect discourse mode can be overridden by discourse prominence. That is, a referent that is repeatedly mentioned in a short discourse is preferred as the perspectival center regardless of the prominence of a competing referent in the sentence preceding a sentence in free indirect discourse mode.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">meuser-etal-2024-perspective</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.5210/dad.2024.201</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.dnd-15.4/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-08</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>15</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>1</start>
<end>35</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Perspective-Taking and Protagonist Prominence
%A Meuser, Sara
%A Hinterwimmer, Stefan
%A Hörl, Maximilian
%J Dialogue & Discourse
%D 2024
%8 August
%V 15
%I University of Illinois Chicago
%C Chicago, Illinois, USA
%F meuser-etal-2024-perspective
%X The choice of the perspectival center of a stretch of discourse is crucial for the interpretation of certain phenomena such as free indirect discourse. It has been argued that the protagonist that is most prominent compared to competing protagonists gets to be the perspectival center. In this paper we discuss grammatical function and referential expression as prominence-lending cues and their impact on perspective-taking. We take the anchoring of free indirect discourse as the indicator for a shift in perspective as free indirect discourse can only be processed correctly if the reader is able to ascribe the utterance or thought to a protagonist. Identifying the perspectival center is particularly crucial for the interpretation of a thought or utterance in free indirect discourse mode that can potentially be ascribed to different protagonists, since in contrast to direct or indirect discourse the respective speaker or thinker is not explicitly marked as such in free indirect discourse. In a series of acceptability rating studies, we tested if anchoring of free indirect discourse to the less prominent of two competing referents is perceived to be unnatural. Further, we take a closer look at the role of subject and object as well as the choice of referential expression (proper name compared to indefinite noun phrase). We find that a protagonist referred to with a proper name in subject position is highly preferred as the anchor for free indirect discourse compared to a protagonist referred to with an indefinite noun phrase in object position. Building on these findings, we present evidence that the prominence of the referent that is established in the sentence preceding a sentence in free indirect discourse mode can be overridden by discourse prominence. That is, a referent that is repeatedly mentioned in a short discourse is preferred as the perspectival center regardless of the prominence of a competing referent in the sentence preceding a sentence in free indirect discourse mode.
%R 10.5210/dad.2024.201
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.dnd-15.4/
%U https://doi.org/10.5210/dad.2024.201
%P 1-35
Markdown (Informal)
[Perspective-Taking and Protagonist Prominence](https://aclanthology.org/2024.dnd-15.4/) (Meuser et al., DND 2024)
ACL