@inproceedings{chaudhary-etal-2024-towards,
title = "Towards Understanding the Robustness of {LLM}-based Evaluations under Perturbations",
author = "Chaudhary, Manav and
Gupta, Harshit and
Bhat, Savita and
Varma, Vasudeva",
editor = "Lalitha Devi, Sobha and
Arora, Karunesh",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON)",
month = dec,
year = "2024",
address = "AU-KBC Research Centre, Chennai, India",
publisher = "NLP Association of India (NLPAI)",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.icon-1.22/",
pages = "197--205",
abstract = "Traditional evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE fall short when capturing the nuanced qualities of generated text, particularly when there is no single ground truth. In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically Google Gemini 1, to serve as automatic evaluators for non-standardized metrics in summarization and dialog-based tasks. We conduct experiments across multiple prompting strategies to examine how LLMs fare as quality annotators when compared with human judgments on the SummEval and USR datasets, asking the model to generate both a score as well as a justification for the score. Furthermore, we explore the robustness of the LLM evaluator by using perturbed inputs. Our findings suggest that while LLMs show promise, their alignment with human evaluators is limited, they are not robust against perturbations and significant improvements are required for their standalone use as reliable evaluators for subjective metrics."
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="chaudhary-etal-2024-towards">
<titleInfo>
<title>Towards Understanding the Robustness of LLM-based Evaluations under Perturbations</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Manav</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chaudhary</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Harshit</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Gupta</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Savita</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bhat</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vasudeva</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Varma</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-12</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sobha</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lalitha Devi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Karunesh</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Arora</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>NLP Association of India (NLPAI)</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">AU-KBC Research Centre, Chennai, India</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Traditional evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE fall short when capturing the nuanced qualities of generated text, particularly when there is no single ground truth. In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically Google Gemini 1, to serve as automatic evaluators for non-standardized metrics in summarization and dialog-based tasks. We conduct experiments across multiple prompting strategies to examine how LLMs fare as quality annotators when compared with human judgments on the SummEval and USR datasets, asking the model to generate both a score as well as a justification for the score. Furthermore, we explore the robustness of the LLM evaluator by using perturbed inputs. Our findings suggest that while LLMs show promise, their alignment with human evaluators is limited, they are not robust against perturbations and significant improvements are required for their standalone use as reliable evaluators for subjective metrics.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">chaudhary-etal-2024-towards</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.icon-1.22/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-12</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>197</start>
<end>205</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Towards Understanding the Robustness of LLM-based Evaluations under Perturbations
%A Chaudhary, Manav
%A Gupta, Harshit
%A Bhat, Savita
%A Varma, Vasudeva
%Y Lalitha Devi, Sobha
%Y Arora, Karunesh
%S Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON)
%D 2024
%8 December
%I NLP Association of India (NLPAI)
%C AU-KBC Research Centre, Chennai, India
%F chaudhary-etal-2024-towards
%X Traditional evaluation metrics like BLEU and ROUGE fall short when capturing the nuanced qualities of generated text, particularly when there is no single ground truth. In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically Google Gemini 1, to serve as automatic evaluators for non-standardized metrics in summarization and dialog-based tasks. We conduct experiments across multiple prompting strategies to examine how LLMs fare as quality annotators when compared with human judgments on the SummEval and USR datasets, asking the model to generate both a score as well as a justification for the score. Furthermore, we explore the robustness of the LLM evaluator by using perturbed inputs. Our findings suggest that while LLMs show promise, their alignment with human evaluators is limited, they are not robust against perturbations and significant improvements are required for their standalone use as reliable evaluators for subjective metrics.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.icon-1.22/
%P 197-205
Markdown (Informal)
[Towards Understanding the Robustness of LLM-based Evaluations under Perturbations](https://aclanthology.org/2024.icon-1.22/) (Chaudhary et al., ICON 2024)
ACL