@inproceedings{madureira-schlangen-2024-couldnt,
title = "It Couldn{'}t Help but Overhear: On the Limits of Modelling Meta-Communicative Grounding Acts with Supervised Learning",
author = "Madureira, Brielen and
Schlangen, David",
editor = "Kawahara, Tatsuya and
Demberg, Vera and
Ultes, Stefan and
Inoue, Koji and
Mehri, Shikib and
Howcroft, David and
Komatani, Kazunori",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue",
month = sep,
year = "2024",
address = "Kyoto, Japan",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.sigdial-1.13",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2024.sigdial-1.13",
pages = "149--158",
abstract = "Active participation in a conversation is key to building common ground, since understanding is jointly tailored by producers and recipients. Overhearers are deprived of the privilege of performing grounding acts and can only conjecture about intended meanings. Still, data generation and annotation, modelling, training and evaluation of NLP dialogue models place reliance on the overhearing paradigm. How much of the underlying grounding processes are thereby forfeited? As we show, there is evidence pointing to the impossibility of properly modelling human meta-communicative acts with data-driven learning models. In this paper, we discuss this issue and provide a preliminary analysis on the variability of human decisions for requesting clarification. Most importantly, we wish to bring this topic back to the community{'}s table, encouraging discussion on the consequences of having models designed to only {``}listen in{'}{''}.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="madureira-schlangen-2024-couldnt">
<titleInfo>
<title>It Couldn’t Help but Overhear: On the Limits of Modelling Meta-Communicative Grounding Acts with Supervised Learning</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Brielen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Madureira</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Schlangen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-09</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tatsuya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kawahara</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Vera</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Demberg</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Stefan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ultes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Koji</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Inoue</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shikib</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Mehri</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">David</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Howcroft</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kazunori</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Komatani</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Kyoto, Japan</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Active participation in a conversation is key to building common ground, since understanding is jointly tailored by producers and recipients. Overhearers are deprived of the privilege of performing grounding acts and can only conjecture about intended meanings. Still, data generation and annotation, modelling, training and evaluation of NLP dialogue models place reliance on the overhearing paradigm. How much of the underlying grounding processes are thereby forfeited? As we show, there is evidence pointing to the impossibility of properly modelling human meta-communicative acts with data-driven learning models. In this paper, we discuss this issue and provide a preliminary analysis on the variability of human decisions for requesting clarification. Most importantly, we wish to bring this topic back to the community’s table, encouraging discussion on the consequences of having models designed to only “listen in”’.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">madureira-schlangen-2024-couldnt</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2024.sigdial-1.13</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.sigdial-1.13</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-09</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>149</start>
<end>158</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T It Couldn’t Help but Overhear: On the Limits of Modelling Meta-Communicative Grounding Acts with Supervised Learning
%A Madureira, Brielen
%A Schlangen, David
%Y Kawahara, Tatsuya
%Y Demberg, Vera
%Y Ultes, Stefan
%Y Inoue, Koji
%Y Mehri, Shikib
%Y Howcroft, David
%Y Komatani, Kazunori
%S Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue
%D 2024
%8 September
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Kyoto, Japan
%F madureira-schlangen-2024-couldnt
%X Active participation in a conversation is key to building common ground, since understanding is jointly tailored by producers and recipients. Overhearers are deprived of the privilege of performing grounding acts and can only conjecture about intended meanings. Still, data generation and annotation, modelling, training and evaluation of NLP dialogue models place reliance on the overhearing paradigm. How much of the underlying grounding processes are thereby forfeited? As we show, there is evidence pointing to the impossibility of properly modelling human meta-communicative acts with data-driven learning models. In this paper, we discuss this issue and provide a preliminary analysis on the variability of human decisions for requesting clarification. Most importantly, we wish to bring this topic back to the community’s table, encouraging discussion on the consequences of having models designed to only “listen in”’.
%R 10.18653/v1/2024.sigdial-1.13
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.sigdial-1.13
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.sigdial-1.13
%P 149-158
Markdown (Informal)
[It Couldn’t Help but Overhear: On the Limits of Modelling Meta-Communicative Grounding Acts with Supervised Learning](https://aclanthology.org/2024.sigdial-1.13) (Madureira & Schlangen, SIGDIAL 2024)
ACL