Why academia should cut back general enthusiasm about CAs

Alessia Giulimondi


Abstract
This position paper will analyze LLMs, the core technology of CAs, from a socio-technical and linguistic perspective in order to argue for a limitation of its use in academia, which should be reflected in a more cautious adoption of CAs in private spaces. The article describes how machine learning technologies like LLMs are inserted into a more general process of platformization (van Dijck, 2021), negatively affecting autonomy of research (Kersessens and van Dijck, 2022). Moreover, fine-tuning practices, as means to polish language models (Kasirzadeh and Gabriel, 2023) are questioned, explaining how these foster a deterministic approach to language. A leading role of universities in this general gain of awareness is strongly advocated, as institutions that support transparent and open science, in order to foster and protect democratic values in our societies.
Anthology ID:
2024.teicai-1.2
Volume:
Proceedings of the 1st Worskhop on Towards Ethical and Inclusive Conversational AI: Language Attitudes, Linguistic Diversity, and Language Rights (TEICAI 2024)
Month:
March
Year:
2024
Address:
St Julians, Malta
Editors:
Nina Hosseini-Kivanani, Sviatlana Höhn, Dimitra Anastasiou, Bettina Migge, Angela Soltan, Doris Dippold, Ekaterina Kamlovskaya, Fred Philippy
Venues:
TEICAI | WS
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
9–15
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2024.teicai-1.2
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Alessia Giulimondi. 2024. Why academia should cut back general enthusiasm about CAs. In Proceedings of the 1st Worskhop on Towards Ethical and Inclusive Conversational AI: Language Attitudes, Linguistic Diversity, and Language Rights (TEICAI 2024), pages 9–15, St Julians, Malta. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
Why academia should cut back general enthusiasm about CAs (Giulimondi, TEICAI-WS 2024)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2024.teicai-1.2.pdf