@inproceedings{ohagi-2024-polarization,
title = "Polarization of Autonomous Generative {AI} Agents Under Echo Chambers",
author = "Ohagi, Masaya",
editor = "De Clercq, Orph{\'e}e and
Barriere, Valentin and
Barnes, Jeremy and
Klinger, Roman and
Sedoc, Jo{\~a}o and
Tafreshi, Shabnam",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, {\&} Social Media Analysis",
month = aug,
year = "2024",
address = "Bangkok, Thailand",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2024.wassa-1.10",
pages = "112--124",
abstract = "Online social networks often create echo chambers where people only hear opinions reinforcing their beliefs.An echo chamber often generates polarization, leading to conflicts between people with radical opinions.The echo chamber has been viewed as a human-specific problem, but this implicit assumption is becoming less reasonable as large language models, such as ChatGPT, acquire social abilities. In response to this situation, we investigated the potential for polarization to occur among a group of autonomous AI agents based on generative language models in an echo chamber environment. We had AI agents discuss specific topics and analyzed how the group{'}s opinions changed as the discussion progressed. As a result, we found that the group of agents based on ChatGPT tended to become polarized in echo chamber environments. The analysis of opinion transitions shows that this result is caused by ChatGPT{'}s high prompt understanding ability to update its opinion by considering its own and surrounding agents{'} opinions. We conducted additional experiments to investigate under what specific conditions AI agents tended to polarize. As a result, we identified factors that influence polarization, such as the agent{'}s persona.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="ohagi-2024-polarization">
<titleInfo>
<title>Polarization of Autonomous Generative AI Agents Under Echo Chambers</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Masaya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ohagi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2024-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Orphée</namePart>
<namePart type="family">De Clercq</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Valentin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Barriere</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jeremy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Barnes</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Roman</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Klinger</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">João</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sedoc</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Shabnam</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tafreshi</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Bangkok, Thailand</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Online social networks often create echo chambers where people only hear opinions reinforcing their beliefs.An echo chamber often generates polarization, leading to conflicts between people with radical opinions.The echo chamber has been viewed as a human-specific problem, but this implicit assumption is becoming less reasonable as large language models, such as ChatGPT, acquire social abilities. In response to this situation, we investigated the potential for polarization to occur among a group of autonomous AI agents based on generative language models in an echo chamber environment. We had AI agents discuss specific topics and analyzed how the group’s opinions changed as the discussion progressed. As a result, we found that the group of agents based on ChatGPT tended to become polarized in echo chamber environments. The analysis of opinion transitions shows that this result is caused by ChatGPT’s high prompt understanding ability to update its opinion by considering its own and surrounding agents’ opinions. We conducted additional experiments to investigate under what specific conditions AI agents tended to polarize. As a result, we identified factors that influence polarization, such as the agent’s persona.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">ohagi-2024-polarization</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2024.wassa-1.10</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2024-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>112</start>
<end>124</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Polarization of Autonomous Generative AI Agents Under Echo Chambers
%A Ohagi, Masaya
%Y De Clercq, Orphée
%Y Barriere, Valentin
%Y Barnes, Jeremy
%Y Klinger, Roman
%Y Sedoc, João
%Y Tafreshi, Shabnam
%S Proceedings of the 14th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment, & Social Media Analysis
%D 2024
%8 August
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Bangkok, Thailand
%F ohagi-2024-polarization
%X Online social networks often create echo chambers where people only hear opinions reinforcing their beliefs.An echo chamber often generates polarization, leading to conflicts between people with radical opinions.The echo chamber has been viewed as a human-specific problem, but this implicit assumption is becoming less reasonable as large language models, such as ChatGPT, acquire social abilities. In response to this situation, we investigated the potential for polarization to occur among a group of autonomous AI agents based on generative language models in an echo chamber environment. We had AI agents discuss specific topics and analyzed how the group’s opinions changed as the discussion progressed. As a result, we found that the group of agents based on ChatGPT tended to become polarized in echo chamber environments. The analysis of opinion transitions shows that this result is caused by ChatGPT’s high prompt understanding ability to update its opinion by considering its own and surrounding agents’ opinions. We conducted additional experiments to investigate under what specific conditions AI agents tended to polarize. As a result, we identified factors that influence polarization, such as the agent’s persona.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2024.wassa-1.10
%P 112-124
Markdown (Informal)
[Polarization of Autonomous Generative AI Agents Under Echo Chambers](https://aclanthology.org/2024.wassa-1.10) (Ohagi, WASSA-WS 2024)
ACL