Comparative Study of Double Scoring Design for Measuring Mathematical Quality of Instruction

Jonathan Kyle Foster, James Drimalla, Nursultan Japashov


Abstract
The integration of automated scoring and addressing whether it might meet the extensive need for double scoring in classroom observation systems is the focus of this study. We outline an accessible approach for determining the interchangeability of automated systems within comparative scoring design studies.
Anthology ID:
2025.aimecon-main.18
Volume:
Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Full Papers
Month:
October
Year:
2025
Address:
Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh, Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Editors:
Joshua Wilson, Christopher Ormerod, Magdalen Beiting Parrish
Venue:
AIME-Con
SIG:
Publisher:
National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME)
Note:
Pages:
163–171
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2025.aimecon-main.18/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Jonathan Kyle Foster, James Drimalla, and Nursultan Japashov. 2025. Comparative Study of Double Scoring Design for Measuring Mathematical Quality of Instruction. In Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence in Measurement and Education Conference (AIME-Con): Full Papers, pages 163–171, Wyndham Grand Pittsburgh, Downtown, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME).
Cite (Informal):
Comparative Study of Double Scoring Design for Measuring Mathematical Quality of Instruction (Foster et al., AIME-Con 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2025.aimecon-main.18.pdf