@inproceedings{tang-tang-2025-system-report,
title = "System Report for {CCL}25-Eval Task 6: Enhancing {C}hinese Essay Rhetoric Recognition through Targeted Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble Voting",
author = "Tang, Jingjun and
Tang, Zhiwen",
editor = "Lin, Hongfei and
Li, Bin and
Tan, Hongye",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 24th {C}hina National Conference on Computational Linguistics ({CCL} 2025)",
month = aug,
year = "2025",
address = "Jinan, China",
publisher = "Chinese Information Processing Society of China",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.ccl-2.29/",
pages = "244--251",
abstract = "``This paper presents our approach to the Second Chinese Essay Rhetoric Identification and Understanding Competition, which focuses on analyzing rhetorical features in essays written by primary and secondary school students. The competition includes three tasks: multi-label classification of rhetorical forms, divided into 9 coarse-grained and 19 fine-grained categories; multi-label classification of rhetorical content, comprising 5 coarse-grained and 11 fine-grained categories specific to certain rhetorical types; and extraction of rhetorical components, including connectives, descriptive objects, and specific rhetorical content. To address the challenge of limited training data, we applied targeted data augmentation and manual corrections to build a high-quality dataset. We then fine-tuned large language models using one-shot and in-context learning. Finally, we employed an ensemble strategy that integrates model predictions through a voting mechanism. Our system achieved a score of 52.78 and ranked third in the competition.''"
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="tang-tang-2025-system-report">
<titleInfo>
<title>System Report for CCL25-Eval Task 6: Enhancing Chinese Essay Rhetoric Recognition through Targeted Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble Voting</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jingjun</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Zhiwen</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2025-08</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 24th China National Conference on Computational Linguistics (CCL 2025)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hongfei</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Bin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Hongye</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Tan</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Chinese Information Processing Society of China</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Jinan, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>“This paper presents our approach to the Second Chinese Essay Rhetoric Identification and Understanding Competition, which focuses on analyzing rhetorical features in essays written by primary and secondary school students. The competition includes three tasks: multi-label classification of rhetorical forms, divided into 9 coarse-grained and 19 fine-grained categories; multi-label classification of rhetorical content, comprising 5 coarse-grained and 11 fine-grained categories specific to certain rhetorical types; and extraction of rhetorical components, including connectives, descriptive objects, and specific rhetorical content. To address the challenge of limited training data, we applied targeted data augmentation and manual corrections to build a high-quality dataset. We then fine-tuned large language models using one-shot and in-context learning. Finally, we employed an ensemble strategy that integrates model predictions through a voting mechanism. Our system achieved a score of 52.78 and ranked third in the competition.”</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">tang-tang-2025-system-report</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.ccl-2.29/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2025-08</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>244</start>
<end>251</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T System Report for CCL25-Eval Task 6: Enhancing Chinese Essay Rhetoric Recognition through Targeted Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble Voting
%A Tang, Jingjun
%A Tang, Zhiwen
%Y Lin, Hongfei
%Y Li, Bin
%Y Tan, Hongye
%S Proceedings of the 24th China National Conference on Computational Linguistics (CCL 2025)
%D 2025
%8 August
%I Chinese Information Processing Society of China
%C Jinan, China
%F tang-tang-2025-system-report
%X “This paper presents our approach to the Second Chinese Essay Rhetoric Identification and Understanding Competition, which focuses on analyzing rhetorical features in essays written by primary and secondary school students. The competition includes three tasks: multi-label classification of rhetorical forms, divided into 9 coarse-grained and 19 fine-grained categories; multi-label classification of rhetorical content, comprising 5 coarse-grained and 11 fine-grained categories specific to certain rhetorical types; and extraction of rhetorical components, including connectives, descriptive objects, and specific rhetorical content. To address the challenge of limited training data, we applied targeted data augmentation and manual corrections to build a high-quality dataset. We then fine-tuned large language models using one-shot and in-context learning. Finally, we employed an ensemble strategy that integrates model predictions through a voting mechanism. Our system achieved a score of 52.78 and ranked third in the competition.”
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.ccl-2.29/
%P 244-251
Markdown (Informal)
[System Report for CCL25-Eval Task 6: Enhancing Chinese Essay Rhetoric Recognition through Targeted Data Augmentation and Model Ensemble Voting](https://aclanthology.org/2025.ccl-2.29/) (Tang & Tang, CCL 2025)
ACL