<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="rizzi-etal-2025-bunch">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Is a bunch of words enough to detect disagreement in hateful content?</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Giulia</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Rizzi</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Paolo</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Rosso</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Elisabetta</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Fersini</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2025-01</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of Context and Meaning: Navigating Disagreements in NLP Annotation</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Michael</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Roth</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Dominik</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Schlechtweg</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>International Committee on Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Abu Dhabi, UAE</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>The complexity of the annotation process when adopting crowdsourcing platforms for labeling hateful content can be linked to the presence of textual constituents that can be ambiguous, misinterpreted, or characterized by a reduced surrounding context. In this paper, we address the problem of perspectivism in hateful speech by leveraging contextualized embedding representation of their constituents and weighted probability functions. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is assessed using four datasets provided for the SemEval 2023 Task 11 shared task. The results emphasize that a few elements can serve as a proxy to identify sentences that may be perceived differently by multiple readers, without the need of necessarily exploiting complex Large Language Models.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">rizzi-etal-2025-bunch</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.comedi-1.1/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2025-01</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>1</start>
            <end>11</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Is a bunch of words enough to detect disagreement in hateful content?
%A Rizzi, Giulia
%A Rosso, Paolo
%A Fersini, Elisabetta
%Y Roth, Michael
%Y Schlechtweg, Dominik
%S Proceedings of Context and Meaning: Navigating Disagreements in NLP Annotation
%D 2025
%8 January
%I International Committee on Computational Linguistics
%C Abu Dhabi, UAE
%F rizzi-etal-2025-bunch
%X The complexity of the annotation process when adopting crowdsourcing platforms for labeling hateful content can be linked to the presence of textual constituents that can be ambiguous, misinterpreted, or characterized by a reduced surrounding context. In this paper, we address the problem of perspectivism in hateful speech by leveraging contextualized embedding representation of their constituents and weighted probability functions. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is assessed using four datasets provided for the SemEval 2023 Task 11 shared task. The results emphasize that a few elements can serve as a proxy to identify sentences that may be perceived differently by multiple readers, without the need of necessarily exploiting complex Large Language Models.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.comedi-1.1/
%P 1-11

Markdown (Informal)

[Is a bunch of words enough to detect disagreement in hateful content?](https://aclanthology.org/2025.comedi-1.1/) (Rizzi et al., CoMeDi 2025)

• Is a bunch of words enough to detect disagreement in hateful content? (Rizzi et al., CoMeDi 2025)

ACL

• Giulia Rizzi, Paolo Rosso, and Elisabetta Fersini. 2025. Is a bunch of words enough to detect disagreement in hateful content?. In Proceedings of Context and Meaning: Navigating Disagreements in NLP Annotation, pages 1–11, Abu Dhabi, UAE. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.