@inproceedings{kaur-2025-echoes,
title = "Echoes of Agreement: Argument Driven Sycophancy in Large Language models",
author = "Kaur, Avneet",
editor = "Christodoulopoulos, Christos and
Chakraborty, Tanmoy and
Rose, Carolyn and
Peng, Violet",
booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025",
month = nov,
year = "2025",
address = "Suzhou, China",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1241/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1241",
pages = "22803--22812",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-335-7",
abstract = "Existing evaluation of political biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) outline the high sensitivity to prompt formulation. Furthermore, Large Language Models are known to exhibit sycophancy, a tendency to align their outputs with a user{'}s stated belief, which is often attributed to human feedback during fine-tuning. However, such bias in the presence of explicit argumentation within a prompt remains underexplored. This paper investigates how argumentative prompts induce sycophantic behaviour in LLMs in a political context. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that models consistently alter their responses to mirror the stance present expressed by the user. This sycophantic behaviour is observed in both single and multi-turn interactions, and its intensity correlates with argument strength. Our findings establish a link between user stance and model sycophancy, revealing a critical vulnerability that impacts model reliability. Thus has significant implications for models being deployed in real-world settings and calls for developing robust evaluations and mitigations against manipulative or biased interactions."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="kaur-2025-echoes">
<titleInfo>
<title>Echoes of Agreement: Argument Driven Sycophancy in Large Language models</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Avneet</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kaur</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2025-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christos</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Christodoulopoulos</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tanmoy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chakraborty</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Carolyn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rose</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Violet</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Peng</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Suzhou, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-335-7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Existing evaluation of political biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) outline the high sensitivity to prompt formulation. Furthermore, Large Language Models are known to exhibit sycophancy, a tendency to align their outputs with a user’s stated belief, which is often attributed to human feedback during fine-tuning. However, such bias in the presence of explicit argumentation within a prompt remains underexplored. This paper investigates how argumentative prompts induce sycophantic behaviour in LLMs in a political context. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that models consistently alter their responses to mirror the stance present expressed by the user. This sycophantic behaviour is observed in both single and multi-turn interactions, and its intensity correlates with argument strength. Our findings establish a link between user stance and model sycophancy, revealing a critical vulnerability that impacts model reliability. Thus has significant implications for models being deployed in real-world settings and calls for developing robust evaluations and mitigations against manipulative or biased interactions.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">kaur-2025-echoes</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1241</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1241/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2025-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>22803</start>
<end>22812</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Echoes of Agreement: Argument Driven Sycophancy in Large Language models
%A Kaur, Avneet
%Y Christodoulopoulos, Christos
%Y Chakraborty, Tanmoy
%Y Rose, Carolyn
%Y Peng, Violet
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
%D 2025
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Suzhou, China
%@ 979-8-89176-335-7
%F kaur-2025-echoes
%X Existing evaluation of political biases in Large Language Models (LLMs) outline the high sensitivity to prompt formulation. Furthermore, Large Language Models are known to exhibit sycophancy, a tendency to align their outputs with a user’s stated belief, which is often attributed to human feedback during fine-tuning. However, such bias in the presence of explicit argumentation within a prompt remains underexplored. This paper investigates how argumentative prompts induce sycophantic behaviour in LLMs in a political context. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrate that models consistently alter their responses to mirror the stance present expressed by the user. This sycophantic behaviour is observed in both single and multi-turn interactions, and its intensity correlates with argument strength. Our findings establish a link between user stance and model sycophancy, revealing a critical vulnerability that impacts model reliability. Thus has significant implications for models being deployed in real-world settings and calls for developing robust evaluations and mitigations against manipulative or biased interactions.
%R 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1241
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1241/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1241
%P 22803-22812
Markdown (Informal)
[Echoes of Agreement: Argument Driven Sycophancy in Large Language models](https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1241/) (Kaur, Findings 2025)
ACL