@inproceedings{jung-etal-2025-similarity,
title = "A Similarity Measure for Comparing Conversational Dynamics",
author = "Jung, Sang Min and
Zhang, Kaixiang and
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian",
editor = "Christodoulopoulos, Christos and
Chakraborty, Tanmoy and
Rose, Carolyn and
Peng, Violet",
booktitle = "Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025",
month = nov,
year = "2025",
address = "Suzhou, China",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1327/",
doi = "10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1327",
pages = "24416--24447",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-335-7",
abstract = "The quality of a conversation goes beyond the individual quality of each reply, and instead emerges from how these combine into interactional dynamics that give the conversation its distinctive overall ``shape''. However, there is no robust automated method for comparing conversations in terms of their overall dynamics. Such methods could enhance the analysis of conversational data and help evaluate conversational agents more holistically.In this work, we introduce a similarity measure for comparing conversations with respect to their dynamics. We design a validation procedure for testing the robustness of the metric in capturing differences in conversation dynamics and for assessing its sensitivity to the topic of the conversations. To illustrate the measure{'}s utility, we use it to analyze conversational dynamics in a large online community, bringing new insights into the role of situational power in conversations."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="jung-etal-2025-similarity">
<titleInfo>
<title>A Similarity Measure for Comparing Conversational Dynamics</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sang</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Min</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jung</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kaixiang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Cristian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2025-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Christos</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Christodoulopoulos</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tanmoy</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Chakraborty</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Carolyn</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rose</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Violet</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Peng</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Suzhou, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-335-7</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The quality of a conversation goes beyond the individual quality of each reply, and instead emerges from how these combine into interactional dynamics that give the conversation its distinctive overall “shape”. However, there is no robust automated method for comparing conversations in terms of their overall dynamics. Such methods could enhance the analysis of conversational data and help evaluate conversational agents more holistically.In this work, we introduce a similarity measure for comparing conversations with respect to their dynamics. We design a validation procedure for testing the robustness of the metric in capturing differences in conversation dynamics and for assessing its sensitivity to the topic of the conversations. To illustrate the measure’s utility, we use it to analyze conversational dynamics in a large online community, bringing new insights into the role of situational power in conversations.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">jung-etal-2025-similarity</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1327</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1327/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2025-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>24416</start>
<end>24447</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T A Similarity Measure for Comparing Conversational Dynamics
%A Jung, Sang Min
%A Zhang, Kaixiang
%A Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, Cristian
%Y Christodoulopoulos, Christos
%Y Chakraborty, Tanmoy
%Y Rose, Carolyn
%Y Peng, Violet
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
%D 2025
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Suzhou, China
%@ 979-8-89176-335-7
%F jung-etal-2025-similarity
%X The quality of a conversation goes beyond the individual quality of each reply, and instead emerges from how these combine into interactional dynamics that give the conversation its distinctive overall “shape”. However, there is no robust automated method for comparing conversations in terms of their overall dynamics. Such methods could enhance the analysis of conversational data and help evaluate conversational agents more holistically.In this work, we introduce a similarity measure for comparing conversations with respect to their dynamics. We design a validation procedure for testing the robustness of the metric in capturing differences in conversation dynamics and for assessing its sensitivity to the topic of the conversations. To illustrate the measure’s utility, we use it to analyze conversational dynamics in a large online community, bringing new insights into the role of situational power in conversations.
%R 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1327
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1327/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1327
%P 24416-24447
Markdown (Informal)
[A Similarity Measure for Comparing Conversational Dynamics](https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.1327/) (Jung et al., Findings 2025)
ACL