<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="zeng-etal-2025-empirical">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>An Empirical Study of Position Bias in Modern Information Retrieval</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Ziyang</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Zeng</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Dun</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Jiacheng</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name>
        <namePart>Zoupanxiang</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Yudong</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Zhou</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Yuqing</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Yang</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2025-11</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Christos</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Christodoulopoulos</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Tanmoy</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Chakraborty</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Carolyn</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Rose</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Violet</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Peng</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Suzhou, China</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
        <identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-335-7</identifier>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>This study investigates the position bias in information retrieval, where models tend to overemphasize content at the beginning of passages while neglecting semantically relevant information that appears later. To analyze the extent and impact of position bias, we introduce a new evaluation framework consisting of two position-aware retrieval benchmarks (SQuAD-PosQ, FineWeb-PosQ) and an intuitive diagnostic metric, the Position Sensitivity Index (PSI), for quantifying position bias from a worst-case perspective. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation across the full retrieval pipeline, including BM25, dense embedding models, ColBERT-style late-interaction models, and full-interaction reranker models. Our experiments show that when relevant information appears later in the passage, dense embedding models and ColBERT-style models suffer significant performance degradation (an average drop of 15.6%). In contrast, BM25 and reranker models demonstrate greater robustness to such positional variation. These findings provide practical insights into model sensitivity to the position of relevant information and offer guidance for building more position-robust retrieval systems. Code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/NovaSearch-Team/position-bias-in-IR.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">zeng-etal-2025-empirical</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.271</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.271/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2025-11</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>5069</start>
            <end>5081</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T An Empirical Study of Position Bias in Modern Information Retrieval
%A Zeng, Ziyang
%A Zhang, Dun
%A Li, Jiacheng
%A Zhou, Yudong
%A Yang, Yuqing
%Y Christodoulopoulos, Christos
%Y Chakraborty, Tanmoy
%Y Rose, Carolyn
%Y Peng, Violet
%A Zoupanxiang
%S Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025
%D 2025
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Suzhou, China
%@ 979-8-89176-335-7
%F zeng-etal-2025-empirical
%X This study investigates the position bias in information retrieval, where models tend to overemphasize content at the beginning of passages while neglecting semantically relevant information that appears later. To analyze the extent and impact of position bias, we introduce a new evaluation framework consisting of two position-aware retrieval benchmarks (SQuAD-PosQ, FineWeb-PosQ) and an intuitive diagnostic metric, the Position Sensitivity Index (PSI), for quantifying position bias from a worst-case perspective. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation across the full retrieval pipeline, including BM25, dense embedding models, ColBERT-style late-interaction models, and full-interaction reranker models. Our experiments show that when relevant information appears later in the passage, dense embedding models and ColBERT-style models suffer significant performance degradation (an average drop of 15.6%). In contrast, BM25 and reranker models demonstrate greater robustness to such positional variation. These findings provide practical insights into model sensitivity to the position of relevant information and offer guidance for building more position-robust retrieval systems. Code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/NovaSearch-Team/position-bias-in-IR.
%R 10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.271
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.271/
%U https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.271
%P 5069-5081

Markdown (Informal)

[An Empirical Study of Position Bias in Modern Information Retrieval](https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-emnlp.271/) (Zeng et al., Findings 2025)

• An Empirical Study of Position Bias in Modern Information Retrieval (Zeng et al., Findings 2025)

ACL

• Ziyang Zeng, Dun Zhang, Jiacheng Li, Zoupanxiang, Yudong Zhou, and Yuqing Yang. 2025. An Empirical Study of Position Bias in Modern Information Retrieval. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, pages 5069–5081, Suzhou, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.