@inproceedings{stebakov-pershin-2025-well,
title = "How Well Can {AI} Models Generate Human Eye Movements During Reading?",
author = "Stebakov, Ivan and
Pershin, Ilya",
editor = "Blodgett, Su Lin and
Curry, Amanda Cercas and
Dev, Sunipa and
Li, Siyan and
Madaio, Michael and
Wang, Jack and
Wu, Sherry Tongshuang and
Xiao, Ziang and
Yang, Diyi",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Bridging Human-Computer Interaction and Natural Language Processing (HCI+NLP)",
month = nov,
year = "2025",
address = "Suzhou, China",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.hcinlp-1.12/",
pages = "148--162",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-353-1",
abstract = "Eye movement analysis has become an essential tool for studying cognitive processes in reading, serving both psycholinguistic research and natural language processing applications aimed at enhancing language model performance. However, the scarcity of eye-tracking data and its limited generalizability constrain data-driven approaches. Synthetic scanpath generation offers a potential solution to these limitations. While recent advances in scanpath generation show promise, current literature lacks systematic evaluation frameworks that comprehensively assess models' ability to reproduce natural reading gaze patterns. Existing studies often focus on isolated metrics rather than holistic evaluation of cognitive plausibility. This study presents a systematic evaluation of contemporary scanpath generation models, assessing their capacity to replicate natural reading behavior through comprehensive scanpath analysis. We demonstrate that while synthetic scanpath models successfully reproduce basic gaze patterns, significant limitations persist in capturing part-of-speech dependent gaze features and reading behaviors. Our cross-dataset comparison reveals performance degradation in three key areas: generalization across text genres, processing of long sentences, and reproduction of psycholinguistic effects. These findings underscore the need for more robust evaluation protocols and model architectures that better account for psycholinguistic complexity. Through detailed analysis of fixation sequences, durations, and reading patterns, we identify concrete pathways for developing more cognitively plausible scanpath generation models."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="stebakov-pershin-2025-well">
<titleInfo>
<title>How Well Can AI Models Generate Human Eye Movements During Reading?</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ivan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Stebakov</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ilya</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Pershin</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2025-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Bridging Human-Computer Interaction and Natural Language Processing (HCI+NLP)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Su</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Lin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Blodgett</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Amanda</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Cercas</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Curry</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sunipa</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Dev</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Siyan</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Li</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Michael</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Madaio</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jack</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sherry</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Tongshuang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Wu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ziang</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xiao</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Diyi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Yang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Suzhou, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-353-1</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Eye movement analysis has become an essential tool for studying cognitive processes in reading, serving both psycholinguistic research and natural language processing applications aimed at enhancing language model performance. However, the scarcity of eye-tracking data and its limited generalizability constrain data-driven approaches. Synthetic scanpath generation offers a potential solution to these limitations. While recent advances in scanpath generation show promise, current literature lacks systematic evaluation frameworks that comprehensively assess models’ ability to reproduce natural reading gaze patterns. Existing studies often focus on isolated metrics rather than holistic evaluation of cognitive plausibility. This study presents a systematic evaluation of contemporary scanpath generation models, assessing their capacity to replicate natural reading behavior through comprehensive scanpath analysis. We demonstrate that while synthetic scanpath models successfully reproduce basic gaze patterns, significant limitations persist in capturing part-of-speech dependent gaze features and reading behaviors. Our cross-dataset comparison reveals performance degradation in three key areas: generalization across text genres, processing of long sentences, and reproduction of psycholinguistic effects. These findings underscore the need for more robust evaluation protocols and model architectures that better account for psycholinguistic complexity. Through detailed analysis of fixation sequences, durations, and reading patterns, we identify concrete pathways for developing more cognitively plausible scanpath generation models.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">stebakov-pershin-2025-well</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.hcinlp-1.12/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2025-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>148</start>
<end>162</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T How Well Can AI Models Generate Human Eye Movements During Reading?
%A Stebakov, Ivan
%A Pershin, Ilya
%Y Blodgett, Su Lin
%Y Curry, Amanda Cercas
%Y Dev, Sunipa
%Y Li, Siyan
%Y Madaio, Michael
%Y Wang, Jack
%Y Wu, Sherry Tongshuang
%Y Xiao, Ziang
%Y Yang, Diyi
%S Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Bridging Human-Computer Interaction and Natural Language Processing (HCI+NLP)
%D 2025
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Suzhou, China
%@ 979-8-89176-353-1
%F stebakov-pershin-2025-well
%X Eye movement analysis has become an essential tool for studying cognitive processes in reading, serving both psycholinguistic research and natural language processing applications aimed at enhancing language model performance. However, the scarcity of eye-tracking data and its limited generalizability constrain data-driven approaches. Synthetic scanpath generation offers a potential solution to these limitations. While recent advances in scanpath generation show promise, current literature lacks systematic evaluation frameworks that comprehensively assess models’ ability to reproduce natural reading gaze patterns. Existing studies often focus on isolated metrics rather than holistic evaluation of cognitive plausibility. This study presents a systematic evaluation of contemporary scanpath generation models, assessing their capacity to replicate natural reading behavior through comprehensive scanpath analysis. We demonstrate that while synthetic scanpath models successfully reproduce basic gaze patterns, significant limitations persist in capturing part-of-speech dependent gaze features and reading behaviors. Our cross-dataset comparison reveals performance degradation in three key areas: generalization across text genres, processing of long sentences, and reproduction of psycholinguistic effects. These findings underscore the need for more robust evaluation protocols and model architectures that better account for psycholinguistic complexity. Through detailed analysis of fixation sequences, durations, and reading patterns, we identify concrete pathways for developing more cognitively plausible scanpath generation models.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.hcinlp-1.12/
%P 148-162
Markdown (Informal)
[How Well Can AI Models Generate Human Eye Movements During Reading?](https://aclanthology.org/2025.hcinlp-1.12/) (Stebakov & Pershin, HCINLP 2025)
ACL