What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?

Amelie Wührl

doi:10.36190/2025.32

What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?

Correct Metadata for

Use this form to create a GitHub issue with structured data describing the correction. You will need a GitHub account. Once you create that issue, the correction will be reviewed by a staff member.

⚠️ Mobile Users: Submitting this form to create a new issue will only work with github.com, not the GitHub Mobile app.

Important: The Anthology treat PDFs as authoritative. Please use this form only to correct data that is out of line with the PDF. See our corrections guidelines if you need to change the PDF.

Title Adjust the title. Retain tags such as <fixed-case>.

Authors Adjust author names and order to match the PDF.

Abstract Correct abstract if needed. Retain XML formatting tags such as <tex-math>. You may use ... for bold, ... for italic, ... for underline, <sc>...</sc> for small-caps, <tt>...<tt> for typewriter text, <url>...</url> for URLs, <a href=...> for hyperlinks, and <par/> for paragraph breaks.

Verification against PDF Ensure that the new title/authors match the snapshot below. (If there is no snapshot or it is too small, consult the PDF.)

Authors concatenated from the text boxes above:

ALL author names match the snapshot above—including middle initials, hyphens, and accents.

Abstract

While automatic fact verification has grown into an established research field in the last years, work on the follow-up step, i.e., conveying fact checking results to users, is still lacking. Presumably, this is because it requires a multidisciplinary approach, as NLP methods to generate such result briefs with a meaningful impact may depend on the consideration of complex psychological processes. In this extended abstract, we discuss the setting and the tasks, questions and considerations connected to it.

Anthology ID:: 2025.nlpsi-1.9
Volume:: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ’25
Month:: June
Year:: 2025
Address:: Copenhagen, Denmark
Editors:: Aswathy Velutharambath, Sofie Labat, Neele Falk, Flor Miriam Plaza-del-Arco, Roman Klinger, Véronique Hoste
Venues:: NLPSI | WS
SIG:
Publisher:: Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)
Note:
Pages:: 90–91
Language:
URL:: https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlpsi-1.9/
DOI:: 10.36190/2025.32
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):: Amelie Wuehrl. 2025. What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ’25, pages 90–91, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org).
Cite (Informal):: What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results? (Wuehrl, NLPSI 2025)
Copy Citation:
PDF:: https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlpsi-1.9.pdf

PDF Cite Search Fix data

Export citation

BibTeX
MODS XML
Endnote
Preformatted

@inproceedings{wuehrl-2025-take,
    title = "What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?",
    author = "Wuehrl, Amelie",
    editor = "Velutharambath, Aswathy  and
      Labat, Sofie  and
      Falk, Neele  and
      Plaza-del-Arco, Flor Miriam  and
      Klinger, Roman  and
      Hoste, V{\'e}ronique",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating {NLP} and Psychology to Study Social Interactions ({NLPSI}) @{ICWSM} `25",
    month = jun,
    year = "2025",
    address = "Copenhagen, Denmark",
    publisher = "Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlpsi-1.9/",
    doi = "10.36190/2025.32",
    pages = "90--91",
    abstract = "While automatic fact verification has grown into an established research field in the last years, work on the follow-up step, i.e., conveying fact checking results to users, is still lacking. Presumably, this is because it requires a multidisciplinary approach, as NLP methods to generate such result briefs with a meaningful impact may depend on the consideration of complex psychological processes. In this extended abstract, we discuss the setting and the tasks, questions and considerations connected to it."
}

Download as File

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="wuehrl-2025-take">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Amelie</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Wuehrl</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2025-06</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ‘25</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Aswathy</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Velutharambath</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Sofie</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Labat</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Neele</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Falk</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Flor</namePart>
            <namePart type="given">Miriam</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Plaza-del-Arco</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Roman</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Klinger</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Véronique</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Hoste</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Copenhagen, Denmark</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>While automatic fact verification has grown into an established research field in the last years, work on the follow-up step, i.e., conveying fact checking results to users, is still lacking. Presumably, this is because it requires a multidisciplinary approach, as NLP methods to generate such result briefs with a meaningful impact may depend on the consideration of complex psychological processes. In this extended abstract, we discuss the setting and the tasks, questions and considerations connected to it.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">wuehrl-2025-take</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.36190/2025.32</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlpsi-1.9/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2025-06</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>90</start>
            <end>91</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

Download as File

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?
%A Wuehrl, Amelie
%Y Velutharambath, Aswathy
%Y Labat, Sofie
%Y Falk, Neele
%Y Plaza-del-Arco, Flor Miriam
%Y Klinger, Roman
%Y Hoste, Véronique
%S Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ‘25
%D 2025
%8 June
%I Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org)
%C Copenhagen, Denmark
%F wuehrl-2025-take
%X While automatic fact verification has grown into an established research field in the last years, work on the follow-up step, i.e., conveying fact checking results to users, is still lacking. Presumably, this is because it requires a multidisciplinary approach, as NLP methods to generate such result briefs with a meaningful impact may depend on the consideration of complex psychological processes. In this extended abstract, we discuss the setting and the tasks, questions and considerations connected to it.
%R 10.36190/2025.32
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlpsi-1.9/
%U https://doi.org/10.36190/2025.32
%P 90-91

Download as File

Markdown (Informal)

[What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?](https://aclanthology.org/2025.nlpsi-1.9/) (Wuehrl, NLPSI 2025)

What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results? (Wuehrl, NLPSI 2025)

ACL

Amelie Wuehrl. 2025. What Does it Take to Effectively Communicate Fact Checking Results?. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating NLP and Psychology to Study Social Interactions (NLPSI) @ICWSM ’25, pages 90–91, Copenhagen, Denmark. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org).