<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="nivre-2025-constructions">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Constructions and Strategies in Universal Dependencies</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Joakim</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Nivre</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2025-03</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the Joint 25th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics and 11th Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (NoDaLiDa/Baltic-HLT 2025)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Richard</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Johansson</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Sara</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Stymne</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>University of Tartu Library</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Tallinn, Estonia</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
        <identifier type="isbn">978-9908-53-109-0</identifier>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>Is the framework of Universal Dependencies (UD) compatible with findings from linguistic typology? One way to find out is to investigate whether UD can adequately represent constructions of the world’s languages, as described in William Croft’s recent book Morphosyntax. This paper discusses how such an investigation could be carried out and why it would be useful.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">nivre-2025-constructions</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2025.nodalida-1.45/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2025-03</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>419</start>
            <end>423</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Constructions and Strategies in Universal Dependencies
%A Nivre, Joakim
%Y Johansson, Richard
%Y Stymne, Sara
%S Proceedings of the Joint 25th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics and 11th Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (NoDaLiDa/Baltic-HLT 2025)
%D 2025
%8 March
%I University of Tartu Library
%C Tallinn, Estonia
%@ 978-9908-53-109-0
%F nivre-2025-constructions
%X Is the framework of Universal Dependencies (UD) compatible with findings from linguistic typology? One way to find out is to investigate whether UD can adequately represent constructions of the world’s languages, as described in William Croft’s recent book Morphosyntax. This paper discusses how such an investigation could be carried out and why it would be useful.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2025.nodalida-1.45/
%P 419-423

Markdown (Informal)

[Constructions and Strategies in Universal Dependencies](https://aclanthology.org/2025.nodalida-1.45/) (Nivre, NoDaLiDa 2025)

• Constructions and Strategies in Universal Dependencies (Nivre, NoDaLiDa 2025)

ACL

• Joakim Nivre. 2025. Constructions and Strategies in Universal Dependencies. In Proceedings of the Joint 25th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics and 11th Baltic Conference on Human Language Technologies (NoDaLiDa/Baltic-HLT 2025), pages 419–423, Tallinn, Estonia. University of Tartu Library.