@inproceedings{ayromlou-etal-2026-retrieve,
title = "Retrieve the Logic, Not the Topic: Taxonomic Strategy {RAG} for Cross-Domain Persuasion Agents",
author = "Ayromlou, Sana and
Sehgal, Purvi and
Narayana, Pradyumna",
editor = "Zhang, Yue and
Xu, Ruifeng and
Purwarianti, Ayu and
Rong, Tong and
Suzuki, Jun",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the {A}sia-Pacific Chapter of the {A}ssociation for {C}omputational {L}inguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
month = nov,
year = "2026",
address = "Hengqin, China",
publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
url = "https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.216/",
pages = "4881--4896",
ISBN = "979-8-89176-439-2",
abstract = "Foundation-model agents in multi-step, open-ended environments frequently suffer from compounding errors, where early mistakes contaminate long-horizon trajectories. While Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) succeeds in deterministic domains with external validators{~}(CITATION), agents in subjective, non-deterministic tasks such as persuasion experience problem drift and sycophantic conformity. Focusing on subjective argumentation, we identify semantic leakage in standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) as a reproducible trigger for these failures: standard RAG prioritizes vocabulary overlap over logical structure.\par To mitigate this leakage, we introduce Taxonomic Strategy RAG (TS-RAG), a systems intervention that routes strategy retrieval through a discrete categorical bottleneck to decouple argumentative structure from topical content. Zero-shot, cross-domain evaluations on r/ChangeMyView show that TS-RAG improves the transfer of abstract argumentative logic where standard semantic retrieval degrades ($+14.5$ win-rate points over an unaugmented persuader for Gemini Flash 3.0, $p<0.05$). In asymmetric deployments that mix lightweight and frontier models, TS-RAG raises the win rate of a lightweight persuader against a stronger opponent (70.5{\%} $\rightarrow$ 78.5{\%}, $p<0.05$) and reduces rounds to consensus when the persuader is already dominant. Finally, we introduce trace-level diagnostics via a turn-by-turn Debate State Representation (DSR), and show that strict stance-holding constraints on the opponent are necessary to prevent evaluation collapse caused by default agentic sycophancy."
}<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="ayromlou-etal-2026-retrieve">
<titleInfo>
<title>Retrieve the Logic, Not the Topic: Taxonomic Strategy RAG for Cross-Domain Persuasion Agents</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Sana</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ayromlou</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Purvi</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sehgal</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Pradyumna</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Narayana</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2026-11</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Yue</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ruifeng</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Xu</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ayu</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Purwarianti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Tong</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Rong</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jun</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Suzuki</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
<place>
<placeTerm type="text">Hengqin, China</placeTerm>
</place>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
<identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-439-2</identifier>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Foundation-model agents in multi-step, open-ended environments frequently suffer from compounding errors, where early mistakes contaminate long-horizon trajectories. While Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) succeeds in deterministic domains with external validators (CITATION), agents in subjective, non-deterministic tasks such as persuasion experience problem drift and sycophantic conformity. Focusing on subjective argumentation, we identify semantic leakage in standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) as a reproducible trigger for these failures: standard RAG prioritizes vocabulary overlap over logical structure.\par To mitigate this leakage, we introduce Taxonomic Strategy RAG (TS-RAG), a systems intervention that routes strategy retrieval through a discrete categorical bottleneck to decouple argumentative structure from topical content. Zero-shot, cross-domain evaluations on r/ChangeMyView show that TS-RAG improves the transfer of abstract argumentative logic where standard semantic retrieval degrades (+14.5 win-rate points over an unaugmented persuader for Gemini Flash 3.0, p<0.05). In asymmetric deployments that mix lightweight and frontier models, TS-RAG raises the win rate of a lightweight persuader against a stronger opponent (70.5% \rightarrow 78.5%, p<0.05) and reduces rounds to consensus when the persuader is already dominant. Finally, we introduce trace-level diagnostics via a turn-by-turn Debate State Representation (DSR), and show that strict stance-holding constraints on the opponent are necessary to prevent evaluation collapse caused by default agentic sycophancy.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">ayromlou-etal-2026-retrieve</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.216/</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2026-11</date>
<extent unit="page">
<start>4881</start>
<end>4896</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Retrieve the Logic, Not the Topic: Taxonomic Strategy RAG for Cross-Domain Persuasion Agents
%A Ayromlou, Sana
%A Sehgal, Purvi
%A Narayana, Pradyumna
%Y Zhang, Yue
%Y Xu, Ruifeng
%Y Purwarianti, Ayu
%Y Rong, Tong
%Y Suzuki, Jun
%S Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
%D 2026
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Hengqin, China
%@ 979-8-89176-439-2
%F ayromlou-etal-2026-retrieve
%X Foundation-model agents in multi-step, open-ended environments frequently suffer from compounding errors, where early mistakes contaminate long-horizon trajectories. While Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) succeeds in deterministic domains with external validators (CITATION), agents in subjective, non-deterministic tasks such as persuasion experience problem drift and sycophantic conformity. Focusing on subjective argumentation, we identify semantic leakage in standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) as a reproducible trigger for these failures: standard RAG prioritizes vocabulary overlap over logical structure.\par To mitigate this leakage, we introduce Taxonomic Strategy RAG (TS-RAG), a systems intervention that routes strategy retrieval through a discrete categorical bottleneck to decouple argumentative structure from topical content. Zero-shot, cross-domain evaluations on r/ChangeMyView show that TS-RAG improves the transfer of abstract argumentative logic where standard semantic retrieval degrades (+14.5 win-rate points over an unaugmented persuader for Gemini Flash 3.0, p<0.05). In asymmetric deployments that mix lightweight and frontier models, TS-RAG raises the win rate of a lightweight persuader against a stronger opponent (70.5% \rightarrow 78.5%, p<0.05) and reduces rounds to consensus when the persuader is already dominant. Finally, we introduce trace-level diagnostics via a turn-by-turn Debate State Representation (DSR), and show that strict stance-holding constraints on the opponent are necessary to prevent evaluation collapse caused by default agentic sycophancy.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.216/
%P 4881-4896
Markdown (Informal)
[Retrieve the Logic, Not the Topic: Taxonomic Strategy RAG for Cross-Domain Persuasion Agents](https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.216/) (Ayromlou et al., AACL-IJCNLP 2026)
ACL