<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="zhang-2026-atomic">
    <titleInfo>
        <title>Atomic and Holistic LLM Judges for Reference-Grounded Support Labels: A Prompt-Controlled Comparison</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personal">
        <namePart type="given">Xinran</namePart>
        <namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
        <role>
            <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
        </role>
    </name>
    <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2026-11</dateIssued>
    </originInfo>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <relatedItem type="host">
        <titleInfo>
            <title>Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)</title>
        </titleInfo>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Yue</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Zhang</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Ruifeng</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Xu</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Ayu</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Purwarianti</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Tong</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Rong</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <name type="personal">
            <namePart type="given">Jun</namePart>
            <namePart type="family">Suzuki</namePart>
            <role>
                <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">editor</roleTerm>
            </role>
        </name>
        <originInfo>
            <publisher>Association for Computational Linguistics</publisher>
            <place>
                <placeTerm type="text">Hengqin, China</placeTerm>
            </place>
        </originInfo>
        <genre authority="marcgt">conference publication</genre>
        <identifier type="isbn">979-8-89176-439-2</identifier>
    </relatedItem>
    <abstract>When an LLM judge only has to assign a three-way support label to a candidate answer given a reference, does asking it to decompose the answer into atomic claims help, and at what cost? We compare four single-call designs that share the judge model, the inputs, and the level of instruction detail: candidate-side atomic decomposition, a matched holistic rubric, reference-side decomposition that checks whether each reference claim is covered, and a bidirectional combination. Support labels are constructed from TruthfulQA, ASQA, and QAMPARI references (200 questions and 400 rows per dataset). All four designs are run with Opus-4.6, GPT-4.1, and Gemini Flash Lite; Sonnet-4.6 is added for the candidate-side and holistic designs. Candidate-side decomposition is weak where the label depends on completeness: the holistic rubric is more accurate on ASQA and QAMPARI for every judge while using fewer tokens. Reference-side decomposition is 12.5-21.3 points more accurate than holistic on ASQA for 28-29% more tokens, and stays near the holistic ceiling on QAMPARI at 63-69% more. On TruthfulQA misconceptions, candidate-side decomposition is competitive and significantly better for two judges. On a 60-row single-author subset whose labels are looser than strict reference completeness, candidate-side decomposition edges ahead of holistic for every judge, reversing the construction-label order. What a judge decomposes should follow what the label measures.</abstract>
    <identifier type="citekey">zhang-2026-atomic</identifier>
    <location>
        <url>https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.60/</url>
    </location>
    <part>
        <date>2026-11</date>
        <extent unit="page">
            <start>1281</start>
            <end>1300</end>
        </extent>
    </part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>

%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Atomic and Holistic LLM Judges for Reference-Grounded Support Labels: A Prompt-Controlled Comparison
%A Zhang, Xinran
%Y Zhang, Yue
%Y Xu, Ruifeng
%Y Purwarianti, Ayu
%Y Rong, Tong
%Y Suzuki, Jun
%S Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
%D 2026
%8 November
%I Association for Computational Linguistics
%C Hengqin, China
%@ 979-8-89176-439-2
%F zhang-2026-atomic
%X When an LLM judge only has to assign a three-way support label to a candidate answer given a reference, does asking it to decompose the answer into atomic claims help, and at what cost? We compare four single-call designs that share the judge model, the inputs, and the level of instruction detail: candidate-side atomic decomposition, a matched holistic rubric, reference-side decomposition that checks whether each reference claim is covered, and a bidirectional combination. Support labels are constructed from TruthfulQA, ASQA, and QAMPARI references (200 questions and 400 rows per dataset). All four designs are run with Opus-4.6, GPT-4.1, and Gemini Flash Lite; Sonnet-4.6 is added for the candidate-side and holistic designs. Candidate-side decomposition is weak where the label depends on completeness: the holistic rubric is more accurate on ASQA and QAMPARI for every judge while using fewer tokens. Reference-side decomposition is 12.5-21.3 points more accurate than holistic on ASQA for 28-29% more tokens, and stays near the holistic ceiling on QAMPARI at 63-69% more. On TruthfulQA misconceptions, candidate-side decomposition is competitive and significantly better for two judges. On a 60-row single-author subset whose labels are looser than strict reference completeness, candidate-side decomposition edges ahead of holistic for every judge, reversing the construction-label order. What a judge decomposes should follow what the label measures.
%U https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.60/
%P 1281-1300

Markdown (Informal)

[Atomic and Holistic LLM Judges for Reference-Grounded Support Labels: A Prompt-Controlled Comparison](https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-long.60/) (Zhang, AACL-IJCNLP 2026)

• Atomic and Holistic LLM Judges for Reference-Grounded Support Labels: A Prompt-Controlled Comparison (Zhang, AACL-IJCNLP 2026)

ACL

• Xinran Zhang. 2026. Atomic and Holistic LLM Judges for Reference-Grounded Support Labels: A Prompt-Controlled Comparison. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1281–1300, Hengqin, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.