When Does Knowledge Distillation Hurt? Reliability-Aware Distillation for Low-Resource Language Summarization

Dipto Sumit, Ankan Kumar Roy Srizon, Sadia Khair Rodela, Atia Haque Asha, Mourchona Afrin, Niloy Farhan, Farig Sadeque


Abstract
Knowledge distillation (KD) is a standard approach for compressing sequence-to-sequence models, but its per-sample effects are rarely examined. On the BanSum Bangla summarization benchmark, we find that standard KD improves ROUGE-L by only +0.0003 over a cross-entropy baseline, and that approximately 51.3% of training samples are estimated to actively harm student validation loss under standard KD. We propose two complementary reliability-aware distillation methods. CHAD (Counterfactual Harm-Aware Distillation) measures per-sample KD usefulness via gradient alignment with the validation loss direction and trains a lightweight gate that generalizes this counterfactual judgment to the full training set. EWAD+CPDP combines token-level entropy-weighted adaptive distillation with a capacity-proportional geometric constraint from a second, vocabulary-incompatible teacher. On BanSum, both methods substantially outperform standard KD: CHAD by +0.0173 ROUGE-L and EWAD+CPDP by +0.0219 ROUGE-L, where standard KD itself improves ROUGE-L by only +0.0003; despite using only 60M parameters, both outperform a fine-tuned Qwen 2.5-3B model (50× larger). We further evaluate the stronger method, EWAD+CPDP, across 15 typologically diverse XL-Sum languages organised into three sets, beating the CE-only baseline on 10/15 languages; gains are most reliable where the two teachers contribute complementary signal, and weakest where they have saturated or jointly weak target-language coverage. We release code and trained models to support reproducibility and further research on selective distillation.
Anthology ID:
2026.aacl-short.4
Volume:
Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers)
Month:
November
Year:
2026
Address:
Hengqin, China
Editors:
Yue Zhang, Ruifeng Xu, Ayu Purwarianti, Tong Rong, Jun Suzuki
Venues:
AACL | IJCNLP
SIG:
Publisher:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Note:
Pages:
35–48
Language:
URL:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-short.4/
DOI:
Bibkey:
Cite (ACL):
Dipto Sumit, Ankan Kumar Roy Srizon, Sadia Khair Rodela, Atia Haque Asha, Mourchona Afrin, Niloy Farhan, and Farig Sadeque. 2026. When Does Knowledge Distillation Hurt? Reliability-Aware Distillation for Low-Resource Language Summarization. In Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and the 5th Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), pages 35–48, Hengqin, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Cite (Informal):
When Does Knowledge Distillation Hurt? Reliability-Aware Distillation for Low-Resource Language Summarization (Sumit et al., AACL-IJCNLP 2026)
Copy Citation:
PDF:
https://aclanthology.org/2026.aacl-short.4.pdf